Tag Archives: Dr Richard Horton
Dr Tuller’s questions for Lancet Editor Dr Horton on handling of PACE trial issues
Virology blog post, by David Tuller DrPH, 1 September 2016: Trial By Error, Continued: My Questions for Lancet Editor Richard Horton In January, I posted a list of the questions I still wanted to ask the PACE authors, who have … Continue reading
Lancet invites letter re PACE, then decides not to publish
Virology blog post, by Vincent Racaniello, 29 August 2016: Once Again, Lancet Stumbles on PACE Last February, Virology Blog posted an open letter to The Lancet and its editor, Dr. Richard Horton, describing the indefensible flaws of the PACE trial … Continue reading
PACE-Gate: an update for ME Awareness day
Occupy CFS/ME blog post by Jennie Spotila 12 May 2016: PACE-Gate It is International ME/CFS Awareness Day, and what is most on my mind is the status of PACE-Gate: the controversy over the design, conduct and results of the PACE trial. … Continue reading
3 more UK doctors join request for independent inquiry into PACE Trial
Dr Charles Shepherd, Dr Nigel Speight, and infectious diseases consultant Dr William Weir have joined 39 other signatories to the open letter to the Lancet which first appeared on Prof Vincent Rancaniello’s ‘Virology’ blog on November 13 2015. The letter was … Continue reading
Invest in ME asks Lancet for independent review or retraction of PACE trial
Invest in ME writes: To the Editor of the Lancet – The PACE Trial To: Dr Richard Horton Editor The Lancet 14 November 2015 Dear Dr Horton, You may recall that we contacted you several years ago [1] but received … Continue reading
Key scientists ask Lancet for independent re-analysis of PACE trial
Six eminent researchers, 5 from the USA, 1 from Britain, have sent an open letter to the Editor of the Lancet urging the appointment of an independent panel of researchers to investigate the journal’s reporting of the PACE trial in 2011, due to the … Continue reading
Government orders release of PACE trial data
The ME Action blog reports that the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has ordered Queen Mary University of London to release anonymized PACE trial data to an unnamed complainant. Queen Mary has 28 days to appeal the decision. The report outlines … Continue reading