{"id":19615,"date":"2019-02-20T05:09:59","date_gmt":"2019-02-20T05:09:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/wames.org.uk\/cms-english\/?p=19615"},"modified":"2019-02-20T05:10:38","modified_gmt":"2019-02-20T05:10:38","slug":"ethical-classification-of-me-cfs-in-the-united-kingdom","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/wames.org.uk\/cms-english\/ethical-classification-of-me-cfs-in-the-united-kingdom\/","title":{"rendered":"Ethical classification of ME\/CFS in the United Kingdom"},"content":{"rendered":"<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/full\/10.1111\/bioe.12559\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Ethical classification of ME\/CFS in the United Kingdom<\/a>, by Diane O&#8217;Leary <span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">in<\/span> <em>Bioethics<\/em>,\u00a08 February 2019<\/h3>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"article-section__header main abstractlang_en main\"><strong>Article abstract:<\/strong><\/h3>\n<div class=\"article-section__content en main\">\n<p>Few conditions have sparked as much controversy as myalgic encephalomyelitis\/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME\/CFS). Professional consensus has long suggested that the condition should be classified as psychiatric, while patients and advocacy groups have insisted it is a serious biological disease that requires medical care and research to develop it.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/wames.org.uk\/cms-english\/2019\/02\/ethical-classification-of-me-cfs-in-the-united-kingdom\/bioethics\/\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-19705\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright wp-image-19705 size-full lazyload\" data-src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/wames.org.uk\/cms-english\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/Bioethics.jpg?resize=447%2C237\" alt=\"\" width=\"447\" height=\"237\" data-srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/wames.org.uk\/cms-english\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/Bioethics.jpg?w=447&amp;ssl=1 447w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/wames.org.uk\/cms-english\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/Bioethics.jpg?resize=150%2C80&amp;ssl=1 150w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/wames.org.uk\/cms-english\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/Bioethics.jpg?resize=300%2C159&amp;ssl=1 300w\" data-sizes=\"(max-width: 447px) 100vw, 447px\" src=\"data:image\/svg+xml;base64,PHN2ZyB3aWR0aD0iMSIgaGVpZ2h0PSIxIiB4bWxucz0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy53My5vcmcvMjAwMC9zdmciPjwvc3ZnPg==\" style=\"--smush-placeholder-width: 447px; --smush-placeholder-aspect-ratio: 447\/237;\" \/><\/a>This longstanding debate shifted in 2015, when U.S. governmental health authorities fully embraced medical classification and management. Given that some globally respected health authorities now insist that ME\/CFS is a serious biological disease, this paper asks whether it can be ethical for the U.K. practice guideline now in development to characterize the condition as a mental health disorder.<\/p>\n<p>Following a brief history of ME\/CFS controversy, I offer three arguments to show that it would be unethical for the U.K. to now characterize ME\/CFS as a mental health condition, considering the relevance of that conclusion for ME\/CFS guidelines elsewhere and for other contested conditions.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/sci-hub.tw\/10.1111\/bioe.12559\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Read the full article\u00a0<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Ethical classification of ME\/CFS in the United Kingdom, by Diane O&#8217;Leary in Bioethics,\u00a08 February 2019 &nbsp; Article abstract: Few conditions have sparked as much controversy as myalgic encephalomyelitis\/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME\/CFS). Professional consensus has long suggested that the condition should &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/wames.org.uk\/cms-english\/ethical-classification-of-me-cfs-in-the-united-kingdom\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[1],"tags":[4868,4871,3130,4870],"class_list":["post-19615","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news","tag-bioethics","tag-diane-oleary","tag-informed-consent","tag-policy-guidelines"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p5qkYK-56n","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/wames.org.uk\/cms-english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19615","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/wames.org.uk\/cms-english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/wames.org.uk\/cms-english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wames.org.uk\/cms-english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wames.org.uk\/cms-english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=19615"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/wames.org.uk\/cms-english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19615\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":19708,"href":"https:\/\/wames.org.uk\/cms-english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19615\/revisions\/19708"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/wames.org.uk\/cms-english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=19615"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wames.org.uk\/cms-english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=19615"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wames.org.uk\/cms-english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=19615"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}