Tag Archives: PACE t

Results of the PACE follow-up study are uninterpretable

Correspondence in Lancet psychiatry, 18 January 2016, by James Charles Coyne, Keith R Laws: Results of the PACE follow-up study are uninterpretable The PACE follow-up study[1] is something of a curate’s egg, admirable in ambition, but interpretatively indigestible. Although the … Continue reading

Posted in News | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Results of the PACE follow-up study are uninterpretable