Investigating Post-Exertional Malaise as a core symptom of ME & CFS: a meta-analytic approach

Thesis abstract:

Investigating Post-Exertional Malaise as a Core Symptom of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: A Meta-Analytic Approach, by Abigail A. Brown (2017). Phd thesis 234, College of Science and Health, DePaul University. [Published Online September 27, 2017]

Efforts to establish a reliable and valid case definition for myalgic encephalomyelitis and chronic fatigue syndrome (ME and CFS) have been complicated by an over-reliance on clinical consensus, and inconsistent application of established case definitions by researchers across study sites. This has resulted in the absence of an empirically-based case definition for ME and CFS, as well as failed replication studies on potential diagnostic tests and biomarkers.

One step toward an empirically-driven case definition is determining which symptoms best discriminate between patients with ME and CFS versus controls. Post-exertional malaise (PEM) is considered a cardinal symptom of ME and CFS and is either required or included in many previously proposed case definitions.

PEM refers to the symptom exacerbation and impairment/sickness that follows physical exertion or cognitive effort. PEM is typically assessed subjectively, with a patient describing his or her experience to a physician or on a self-report measure. To date, there have been no meta-analyses of the findings from studies that investigate PEM differences between patients and controls.

A meta-analysis of odds ratios (association between patient status and PEM status) and a number of potential moderators (i.e., study level characteristics) of effect size were conducted for a total of 31 studies.

PEM was found to be 10.4 times more likely to be associated with an ME and CFS diagnosis than with control status. Significant moderators of effect size included patient recruitment strategy and control selection. These findings strongly suggest that PEM should be considered a cardinal symptom of ME and CFS, and the implications of the moderator analyses are discussed.

Posted in News | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Investigating Post-Exertional Malaise as a core symptom of ME & CFS: a meta-analytic approach

Defining & measuring recovery from ME and CFS – the physician perspective

Research abstract:

Defining and measuring recovery from myalgic encephalomyelitis and chronic fatigue syndrome: the physician perspective, by Andrew R. Devendorf, Carly T. Jackson, Madison Sunnquist & Leonard A. Jason in Disability and Rehabilitation [Published online: 05 Oct 2017]

Purpose:

To inform an operationalised definition of recovery from myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME) and chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) for research and practice. Without a consensus on defining and measuring recovery, there will continue to be controversy amongst researchers, clinicians, and patients when interpreting treatment outcomes.

Method:

This study explores physicians’ views on recovery from ME and CFS. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 10 physician participants who are experts in the ME and CFS field. Our deductive thematic analysis, using a realist perspective, provided a framework for differentiating recovery and significant improvement.

Results:

Physicians conceptualised recovery as complete symptom remission and a return to premorbid functioning (adjusted for with age), whereas they viewed significant improvement as a substantial reduction in symptoms with considerable functional gains, where patients may operate in daily life but still must cope or be treated.

Conclusions:

Our findings provide recommendations and approaches for measuring: daily functioning, symptomatology, quality of life, and physical functioning.

  • Implications for rehabilitation
  • Physicians viewed recovery as complete symptom remission and a return to premorbid functioning (adjusted for with age).
  • Recovery from myalgic encephalomyelitis and chronic fatigue syndrome should be viewed as multidimensional, considering patients’ daily life, psychosocial functioning, and overall physical functioning.
  • These findings can improve practitioner-client interactions, as they provide recommendations for measuring recovery in research and practice.
Posted in News | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Defining & measuring recovery from ME and CFS – the physician perspective

A physiotherapist with CFS: a life of ‘pacing and management’

PT in motion (American Physical Therapy Association) blog post, by Eric Ries 13 September 2017: The Real Story About Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) has come a long way since the 1980s, when it was widely dismissed as “yuppie flu” and was suspected by many health care providers of being a psychological rather than a physiological condition.

(A note on terminology: CFS goes by at least 3 names, per the sidebar below this article. As CFS remains the one by which the illness most widely is known, that’s the term PT in Motion is using.)

Nicole Rabanal, PT, was among the skeptics. Until late 2014 she considered “chronic fatigue syndrome” to be “a catch-all term that meant medical science didn’t know what the patient had or didn’t have.”

She changed her mind the morning she woke up “feeling, out of the blue, like I’d been hit by a truck—with severe flu-like symptoms, severe eye pain, headache, ‘heavy’ head, muscle weakness, random numbness and tingling sporadically throughout my body, and difficulty breathing and swallowing.” This sudden and dramatic shift in the then-46-year-old’s health led her on a year-long odyssey through the health care system, during which she saw 17 specialists and was at various times told she had depression, Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome, and myasthenia gravis.

When her fifth neurologist at last hit the nail on the head—CFS is a diagnosis of exclusion for which there is no test—he told her, “Stop doctor-shopping, get off your own back, and wrap your head around this.”

“What do you do with that?” she asks. “I decided that I needed to figure out how to manage this on my own.”

As luck or fate would have it, she soon happened upon—literally dragged herself to—a symposium on CFS at an APTA Combined Sections Meeting. What Rabanal learned that day in Anaheim, California, led her to a treatment relationship with the Salt Lake City-based Bateman Horne Center, which specializes in CFS and fibromyalgia.

Today, her life is “all about pacing and management.” Rabanal, who owns Kinetic Energy Physical Therapy in Steamboat Springs, Colorado, describes her highly regimented routine.

“I work a 2-hour shift in the morning,” she says. “I come home and lie down in a quiet room—with oxygen, and with ice on my eyes and head—for 4 hours. I go back to work for another 2-hour shift. I return home to again lie down with ice and oxygen. I get up and have dinner with my family, and am in bed no later than 8 pm.”

On weekends, she continues, “I stay quiet all day, either lying down or resting. On Sunday, I might get out and do something with my kids for an hour. But that’s it. There’s no going out to eat, and only minimal socializing with friends because prolonged talking is very draining for me. I have significant sensitivity to light and sound, which greatly limits the surroundings in which I place myself.”

The upside, if you want to call it that, has been the demonstrated value of Rabanal’s professional training.

“The knowledge and experience of having been a PT for nearly 25 years has been incredibly helpful to my personal treatment plan,” Rabanal says. “Listening for and understanding the signs of when I’m pushing beyond my energy limitations, then implementing appropriate exercise and stretching, is a big part of the management puzzle. This of course is what PTs do every day with patients, in one form or another—we listen closely and apply our knowledge to their presentation and what we learn from them.”

“I’ve made significant modifications to my treatment style,” Rabanal adds. “I sit a lot, and lean or move to help manage my orthostatic intolerance—which does not allow me to stand still, unsupported, for more than 5 minutes. I co-treat with other therapists in my clinic to perform manual techniques that I no longer can do because of my limited strength. During my work periods, I use a Fitbit to monitor my heartrate and its silent timer to remind me when take my medications.”

“It’s a huge challenge,” she says. “But I love what I do, so I’m determined to make it work.”

Rabanal has a message for her fellow PTs.

“We must know the criteria for patients to meet this diagnosis—significant reduction or impairment in ability to engage in pre-illness activity levels, accompanied by fatigue, for more than 6 months; post-exertional malaise; unrefreshing sleep; and either cognitive impairment or orthostatic intolerance. Because if we aren’t correctly identifying this patient population, it’s easy to push patients into a treatment or exercise program that will make their condition worse. They are likelier to be noncompliant, disinclined to follow up with care, and present as a returning patient whose condition never seems to improve.”

There is a great deal that PTs can do to help patients with CFS of all severity levels, say those who PT in Motion contacted for this article. It begins with listening and a thorough patient interview and extends through education, individualized goal-setting, pacing, movement and strengthening exercises, manual therapy, and appropriate referral.

What PTs can offer, too, is what people with CFS arguably need the most, says Jessie Podolak, PT, DPT, owner of Phileo Health in Altoona, Wisconsin, and a certified therapeutic pain specialist. “We can bring them hope.”

Read more

Posted in News | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on A physiotherapist with CFS: a life of ‘pacing and management’

ME/CFS Biobank gets £1.57m to measure changes in the immune system

CureME blog post, 3 October 2017: MAJOR ANNOUNCEMENT: $2.1m investment is UK’s ‘biggest ever investment into physical causes of ME/CFS’

The CureME team at The London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine is delighted to announce the award of $2.1m (£1.57m) of grant funding from the United States National Institutes of Health.

The grant will fund a longitudinal study that will measure changes in the immune system and genetic profile of individuals with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome.

The new award is a renewal of an initial project, which began in 2013, also made possible by funding from the NIH. The new funding will enable the current project, which is searching for biomarkers (measurable biological characteristics) of the disease, to be extended until 2021.

Dr Luis Nacul, who leads the CureME team at LSHTM and is also responsible for overseeing the UK ME/CFS Biobank, which has been built and maintained by charity support and the funding from America, welcomed the new funding and added:

“The new grant from the NIH (US) will enable, for the first time, comprehensive prospective assessments of cases of ME/CFS at regular intervals. This greatly enhances the chances of a breakthrough in the understanding of the pathophysiology of this complex disease and the identification of much-needed biomarkers for the diagnosis of different sub-groups of patients. We very much look forward to continuing our partnership with the patient community, which has been key to the success of our research so far.”

The grant will enable the collection and storage of blood samples and clinical data from a greater number of people with ME/CFS, to add to the existing resources donated by participants with ME/CFS and multiple sclerosis, as well as healthy controls.

The Biobank is the only resource in the world that includes samples from those most severely-affected – the house- or bed-bound – and is the premier resource outside of the United States for the study of the disease. All participants are examined by a clinician, and must conform to the Biobank’s rigorous protocols before donating tissue samples and data.

The UK charity, The ME Association, has been a long-time supporter of the Biobank and provides funding to support its development. Dr Charles Shepherd, the charity’s medical adviser, and chair of the Biobank steering committee, said:

“This is the biggest ever investment into the physical causes of ME and represents a significant and vital sum of money that will help scientists unravel the mysteries of this devastating illness.

The fact that the NIH has decided to provide another major grant is an important endorsement of the ME/CFS Biobank, and we would like to congratulate all the staff who have been involved in setting up and developing what has become a vital new part of the biomedical research infrastructure here in the UK.

We hope that other research groups will now start to make use of this unique resource to achieve desperately-needed breakthroughs into the cause and treatment of ME/CFS.”

The CureME team would like to thank the many participants who have contributed to the project thus far.

The research is supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) under Award Number R01AI103629. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Read more about the grant

 

 

Posted in News | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on ME/CFS Biobank gets £1.57m to measure changes in the immune system

Health care resource use by patients before & after a diagnosis of CFS/ME

Health care resource use by patients before and after a diagnosis of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS/ME): A clinical practice research datalink study, by Simon Collin, Inger Bakken, Irwin Nazareth, Esther Crawley, & Peter D. White in BMC Family Practice. 18 20017

Research abstract:
Background: Our aim was to investigate patterns of health care resource use by patients before and after a diagnosis of CFS/ME, as recorded by Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) GP practices in the UK.

Methods: We used a case–control study design in which patients who had a first recorded diagnosis of CFS/ME during the period 01/01/2001 to 31/12/2013 were matched 1:1 with controls by age, sex, and GP practice. We compared rates of GP consultations, diagnostic tests, prescriptions, referrals, and symptoms between the two groups from 15 years (in adults) or 10 years (in children) before diagnosis to 10 years after diagnosis.

Results: Data were available for 6710 adult and 916 child (age <18 years) matched case–control pairs. Rates of GP consultations, diagnostic tests, prescriptions, referrals, and symptoms spiked dramatically in the year when a CFS/ME diagnosis was recorded. GP consultation rates were 50% higher in adult cases compared to controls 11–15 years before diagnosis (rate ratio (RR) 1.49 (95% CI 1.46, 1.52)) and 56% higher 6–10 years after diagnosis (RR 1.56 (1.54, 1.57)).

In children, consultation rates in cases were 45% higher 6–10 years before diagnosis (RR 1.45 (1.40, 1.51)) and 62% higher 6–10 years after diagnosis (RR 1.62 (1.54, 1.70)). For adults and children, rates of tests, prescriptions, referrals, and symptoms were higher in cases compared to controls for up to 10 years before and after diagnosis.

Conclusions: Adults and children with CFS/ME have greater health care needs than the rest of the population for at least ten years before their diagnosis, and these higher levels of health care resource use continue for at least ten years after diagnosis.

Editor’s note:  

  • These figures pertain only to people visiting a GP practice who diagnose CFS/ME.  It should be noted that there are patients who do not receive a diagnosis of CFS or ME from their GP for a variety of reasons
  • Severely affected patients who are unable to visit the surgery and who do not receive home visits are unable to access consultations, tests etc
  • GP practices have to agree to send their data to CPRD, so this does not include all GP practices in the UK

 

 

Posted in News | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Health care resource use by patients before & after a diagnosis of CFS/ME

ME costs UK economy over £3 billion

Action for M.E. blog post, 28 Sep 2017: ME costs UK economy over £3 billion

M.E. cost the UK economy at least £3.3 billion in 2014/15, according to a research report published today.

The figures account for healthcare costs, disability-related welfare payments, productivity losses and unpaid informal care.

Funded by the Optimum Health Clinic Foundation, and undertaken by the 2020health thinktank, the Counting the cost report refers to the condition as “the health scandal of our generation.”

At the launch of the report in London this morning, attending by our Head of Communications and Policy, Clare Ogden, Chair of the Optimum Health Clinic Foundation, David Butcher, shared his personal experience of M.E., and explained the rationale for funding this study.

“We need to understand every detail of these costs, to provide a solid platform on which to have a sensible debate,” he said. “We also need a sense of urgency for research to prevent the lives of those with M.E. being needlessly wasted.”

Presenting an overview of her team’s findings, 2020health’s Julia Manning highlighted the considerable disparity of NHS spending on M.E. compared to other chronic, debilitating conditions.

“A stronger commitments to research is needed in recognition of the substantial costs of CFS/M.E. to the UK,” she concluded.

Penny Mordant MP, Minister of State for the Department for Work and Pensions, commended the report, and spoke in more general terms about the challenges facing those with long-term conditions.

“Conditions which are hard to diagnose, are fluctuating, are hidden, are a massive challenge to great big governmental systems,” she said.

“How do we offer personalised support to an individual? We will fail if we try and fit them into an existing system. Good quality, early interventions are key to building support which is sustainable, to really anticipate what someone needs.”

The report described its research as

“a comprehensive UK cost-of-illness study of CFS/M.E., based on recorded patient data from both specialised services and primary care…with little data on welfare payments received by recruited patients, we also contacted the DWP for estimates on ESA and PIP payments to people with CFS/M.E. as a primary disabling condition. According to our weighted analysis, the total cost to the UK economy of CFS/M.E. in 2014/15 was at least £3.3 billion.”

Read comments on the Pheonix rising forum

Posted in News | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on ME costs UK economy over £3 billion

You & yours on Radio 4 discusses treatment for ME & CFS

BBC Radio 4 programme You and yours invited Dr Charles Shepherd, Dr Esther Crawley and the general public to discuss what treatment is offered for ME & CFS and whether the NICE guidelines should be updated.

   You can listen to the programme online

 

 

 

 

Posted in News | Tagged , | Comments Off on You & yours on Radio 4 discusses treatment for ME & CFS

OMF resources for parents of children with ME/CFS

The Open Medicine Foundation Pediatric ME/CFS web page contains information about ME for parents, doctors and educators from a US perspective, but much is helpful in the UK:

The presentation and course of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) is often different in children and adolescence than adults. Dr. David S. Bell, a member of our ME/CFS Scientific Advisory Board and pioneer in the field of Pediatric ME/CFS, provided us an in-depth description of pediatric ME/CFS.

A ME/CFS Pediatric Primer (Frontiers in Pediatrics, 2017) provides a medical understanding for pediatricians, family practice doctors, and all healthcare providers involved in children/student’s care. We encourage parents to share this link with your child’s physician and healthcare team.

The impact of ME/CFS on a young person can be very significant. To help young people and their families cope with educational, social, and developmental challenges, in addition to medical problems, we present three outstanding resources developed by Dr. Faith Newton of Delaware State University. We encourage parents to print these documents and share them with your child’s school administration.

ME/CFS Fact Sheet: Educational Implications
ME/CFS Fact Sheet: Classroom Accommodations
ME/CFS School Fact Sheet: Resource for Parents, Educators & School Nurses

Go to the website to download the fact sheets

Posted in News | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on OMF resources for parents of children with ME/CFS

Guidelines, not tramlines – NICE guidance is not mandatory

NICE director’s blog post, by Mark Baker, 15 Sep 2017:  Guidelines, not tramlines  

Professor Mark Baker, director of the centre of guidelines at NICE

Mark sets the record straight

A recent headline in the Times said ‘Doctors must send obese patients to cookery class’. It was for an article about our updated guidance for preventing type 2 diabetes.

However, instead of raising awareness of our
new guidance it unfortunately suggested NICE recommendations are meant as instructions or advice.

We want to set the record straight.

NICE guidance is not mandatory. Our recommendations never instruct a GP or healthcare professional to do anything. We are here to support their decisions, not dictate them. We assess the very best, highest quality evidence so that they can trust our advice is reliable, but it is then up to them as to whether they follow what we suggest, or whether they think their patient would benefit from a different approach. We recognise that they are best placed to make this call. They are the people who see, treat and talk to their patients about what they want and need, after all.

When headlines and media coverage suggest otherwise, painting a picture of us handing down ‘must dos’ and obligatory instructions, it helps no one.

Our health and social care sector is under immense pressure, facing unprecedented demand from a patient population with complex needs. It is vital now, more than ever that we work together to ensure we are providing the very best care as efficiently as possible.

NICE guidance can help to achieve that, but it should be seen as part of the puzzle, not the only answer.

Posted in News | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Guidelines, not tramlines – NICE guidance is not mandatory

Glial cell inhibitors: the next sleep drugs for FM and ME/CFS?

Health Rising blog post, by Cort Johnson, 15 September: Glial Cell Inhibitors: The Next Sleep Drugs for Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS)?

 

Glia: The Forgotten Brain Cell

Sleep disturbances and severe stress as glial activators: key targets for treating central sensitization in chronic pain patients? by Jo Nijs, Marco L. Loggia, Andrea Polli, Maarten Moens, Eva Huysmans, Lisa Goudman, in Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Targets Volume 21, 2017 – Issue 8

The interplay between central sensitization (pain originating in the central nervous system) and sleep is the theme of this review. Central sensitization (CS) is present in fibromyalgia as well as many chronic pain diseases including arthritis, headache, migraine, chronic fatigue syndrome, low back pain, cancer pain, chronic shoulder pain, rheumatoid arthritis, etc.

Sleep, of course, can be hard to come by, particularly for people in pain. Pain isn’t the only symptom of central sensitization, however.  Central senstization refers to increased sensitivity to all sorts of stimuli including lights, smells, sounds, vibrations, chemicals, even perhaps electrical fields and foods.

The implications of the widespread nature of central sensitization (CS) are potentially enormous. If someone cracks the central sensitization “code” in arthritis, it’s possible a similar code may apply to fibromyalgia or chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS). With fibromyalgia getting so little research money, treatment breakthroughs in FM may very well depend on work done in other diseases.

The fact that CS is widespread is good news for FM and ME/CFS patients because the situation is complex. The sensory processing issues found in FM are associated with problems in many different areas of the central nervous system including the spinal cord, thalamus, insula, somatosensory cortices, anterior cingulate, prefrontal cortex, and brainstem.

The Source of Central Sensitization?

The increased pain sensitivity in FM could all come down to immune cells in the brain called glial cells (microglia, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes). Despite the fact that glial cells are much more common than neurons, they were all but ignored until about 10 years ago. They’re being ignored no longer. When activated, these cells pour out inflammatory factors that tweak the pain pathways, clean up cellular debris and kill pathogens.

When they’re turned on full-time, glial cells can have pathological effects. They’re linked to pain sensitization because they emit many factors (brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), IL-1B, TNF-a) known to send our pain-producing nervous system pathways into a tizzy. When they’re turned on full-time, they produce a state of chronic inflammation found in many central nervous system disorders.

The role poor sleep may play in activating these bad players isn’t being ignored either. Poor sleep, it turns out, appears to bring out the worst in our glial cells.

The great question, though, is how these glial cells get chronically activated. The authors come down to the great catchall, “stress”, which can denote anything from an infection to emotional stress. The authors note that the kind of stress is not the issue; it’s the fact that some sort of stressor is continually present that matters.

One kind of unrelenting stress often found in ME/CFS and FM involves chronic sleep issues.  In fact, stress, sleep, and pain often form a positive feedback loop; chronic pain produces stress which hampers sleep, which, in turn, leads to more pain, more stress, poorer sleep and so on. Just a single night of poor sleep results in increased pain sensitivity and anxiety even in healthy people. Given that fact, it’s perhaps no surprise that no less than 50% and up to 90% of chronic pain patients struggle with insomnia.

As was noted in a recent blog, sleep deprivation results in a low level inflammatory response which produces the same kinds of factors that microglia spew out when activated. This suggests that sleep deprivation, or insomnia, or sleep apnea or any other sleep disorder may, in some cases, actually be able to initiate the central sensitization process; i.e. tip some people into FM.

Neuroinflammation

Being able to detect low-levels of inflammation in the brain has been a goal for many years. Different approaches are being used, but recent studies using the [11C]-(R)-PK11195 positron emission tomography approach have found neuroinflammation in the basal ganglia in complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), in the hippocampus in Alzheimer’s, in Parkinson’s and in multiple sclerosis.

We know that neuroinflammation can produce pain, fatigue, hypersensitivity to stimuli, etc. But is it actually present in chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) and fibromyalgia? The jury is still out on that question.

A Japanese PET scan study succinctly pointed out the problem – lots of speculation – not much evidence.

“Although it is hypothesized that brain inflammation is involved in the pathophysiology of CFS/ME, there is no direct evidence of neuroinflammation in patients with CFS/ME.”

That Japanese study, which was the first to present direct evidence of neuroinflammation, excited many in the field, including Dr. Komaroff, who called it the most important ME/CFS study in years. The study concluded that:

Neuroinflammation is present in widespread brain areas in CFS/ME patients and was associated with the severity of neuropsychologic symptoms. Evaluation of neuroinflammation in CFS/ME patients may be essential for understanding the core pathophysiology and for developing objective diagnostic criteria and effective medical treatments.”

It seemed that we were really onto something and, indeed, Shungu’s findings of increased lactate and/or decreased glutathione in fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome appear to be pointing an arrow at neuroinflammation,. It was very good to see Glassford’s hypothesis paper link neuromuscular issues with neuroinflammation in ME/CFS – nobody has done that before – but what we really, really need are neuroinflammation studies.

Unfortunately, science tends to move very slowly in ME/CFS, and that small 19-person Japanese study, published in 2014, three years later still remains the only direct evidence of neuroinflammation in ME/CFS.

Currently, the Japanese, Andrew Lloyd and Jarred Younger (funded by the SMCI) are all, reportedly, doing neuroinflammation studies. The Japanese study has taken three years to get started but it’s a big one – 120 patients – and should go far to resolve this issue. It’s not clear if the NIH Intramural study has taken up this issue, but it would be surprising if it did not.

The New Sleep Agents?

“It’s not about what the FDA-approved treatments directly target. Fibromyalgia is about neuroinflammation in the central nervous system [CNS]. The key to treatment is to reduce that inflammatory process in the brain. We have to discover and employ both pharmaceutical treatments and other interventions that can get to the CNS and target the cells that drive the inflammation.” Jarred Younger

If glial cells play a major role in the pain and sleep issues found in fibromyalgia and other chronic pain conditions, then glial cell inhibitors, not sleep drugs, may be the best answer. Drug companies are purportedly working hard on developing the next generation of anti-glial cell drugs. Human trials are underway for some substances; many others are being tested either in animals or in the lab.

One of the most interesting drug combinations was identified by combining a complete list of available drugs with a computer program containing research results from ME/CFS. The drug combination highlighted contained two potential glial cell inhibitors – trazodone and low dose naltrexone.

Low Dose Naltrexone Drug Combination Proposed for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS)

Read more on the future sleep drug trials

Posted in News | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Glial cell inhibitors: the next sleep drugs for FM and ME/CFS?