People with ME/CFS have long been told it’s all in their head – these scientists disagree

The Canary blog, 8 June 2016, by Conrad Bower: CFS have long been told it’s all in their head – these scientists disagree

BurntMatchCFS2-770x470

A conference bringing together the brightest minds in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis a.k.a Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) research, presented results that promise to bring a new dawn in understanding this debilitating disease. A hot topic at the conference was the search for reliable biomarkers to diagnose ME/CFS which can also aid understanding the mechanisms behind the disease.

A biomarker is something that can be measured reliably in the body to determine if someone is ill with a particular disease, or recovering due to treatment. For example high levels of glucose in the blood is a biomarker for diabetes. Currently there are no biomarkers available clinically to diagnose ME/CFS, diagnosis relies on a set of symptoms which are also common in other illnesses.

Dr Ian Gibson was chair of the conference, organised by the charity Invest in ME Research, and also an author of a report into ME/CFS presented to the UK government in 2006. Gibson was critical of the government not acting on any of the recommendations presented in the report. Gibson was keen to put the “bad old days” behind them and concentrate on the compelling new science being produced and the opportunities for progress it provides:

‘ I think people are surging to this field, like the pharmaceutical industry, because they will smell money somewhere in cures as they always do… they want to be there when a new drug or treatment is available. ’

More promising data from Norwegian Rituximab trial

Rituximab is a monoclonal antibody that was originally developed to treat cancer, but has recently shown efficacy in treating ME/CFS in a Norwegian clinical trial. It is regarded by many in ME/CFS community as the most promising candidate to become a clinically approved drug treatment for the illness.

Professor Carmen Sheibenbogen, from Charite University Medicine Berlin, presented evidence of auto antibodies to adrenergic and muscarinic receptors being significantly elevated in ME/CFS patients compared to controls. The study published in Brain, Behaviour and Immunity, composed of a group of ME/CFS patients and controls from Germany, but also included analysis done on blood serum samples from the Norwegian Rituximab clinical trial.

The Norwegian patients’ levels of the same auto antibodies were high prior to treatment with rituximab, the levels then decreased after treatment in patients who showed recovery from their ME/CFS symptoms. The key finding however was that patients who did not respond to rituximab treatment did not show any decrease in levels of auto antibodies; indicating the auto antibodies are involved in causing ME/CFS.

Sheibenbogen states in the paper that the adrenergic and muscarinic receptors are “potential biomarkers” for response to rituximab therapy. She goes on to say:

‘ It is conceivable that various symptoms of CFS including cognitive deficits, autonomic dysregulation and immune activation could be partly mediated by auto antibodies against these receptors in a subset of patients. ’

There are many that believe ME/CFS is an autoimmune illness, where the immune system malfunctions and starts to attack things it shouldn’t. This is contrary to the belief of a large part of the medical community who say it is predominantly a psychiatric illness. Sheibenbogen was one of many at the conference adding weight to the theory that ME/CFS is an autoimmune disease.

The microbiome’s role in ME/CFS

The microbiome refers to the collection of bacteria, viruses, and parasites that share our body space. A large proportion of the microbiome is found in the gut, and it is increasingly being linked to involvement in a wide range of diseases including ME/CFS.

Data from an attempt to identify biomarkers by analysing bacterial DNA from the gut microbiome of ME/CFS patients was presented by Prof. Maureen Hanson, of Cornell University. The study showed a lower diversity of bacterial species present in the gut of ME/CFS patients compare to controls. This lower diversity of gut bacteria is also found in Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, both of which are caused by a malfunctioning immune system.

The study failed to produce reliable biomarkers as the data produced and model used in the study was only 53% successful in identifying the results of patients suffering from ME/CFS compared to controls.  This may change soon as Hanson tantalised the conference with news of an as yet unpublished study, using microbiome metabolites as biomarkers, that has achieved 100% accuracy in diagnosing ME/CFS.

Initial results from a study aiming to identify biomarkers by identifying variations in bacteriophage present in people with ME/CFS was presented. Bacteriophage are viruses that attack bacteria, and every bacteria has a specific phage that attacks it, or as Professor Tom Wileman from Norwich University described it:

‘Big fleas have little fleas upon their backs to bite them, and little fleas have lesser fleas, and so ad infinitum.’

Gibson was full of praise for the Norwich study and described Wileman as a ”star”. He explained his desire for greater collaboration between scientists in the ME/CFS field, and revealed plans for:

‘a great big complex in Norwich, a centre for ME, the first in the country. Our team [football] may be going down into the bottom division but we want science to go up.’

Big data approach to understanding ME/CFS

Big data is the way Professor Ron Davis is trying to solve the conundrum of ME/CFS, and he has compelling motivation make progress fast. His son Whitney Defoe has severe ME/CFS, which means he is bed bound and being fed through a tube, barely able to tolerate sounds, light or being touched. Davis gave a moving description of how his son had slipped further into the clutches of ME/CFS, and described him as being “missing for 5 years”.

The strategy followed by Davis differs from others in the field as he is not following a working theory as to how ME/CFS is caused, and then trying to prove that theory through his experiments. The big data approach involves collecting blood, sweat, saliva and fecal samples from people who are severely ill with ME/CFS, and then running pretty much every test known to man on them.

This produces huge amounts of data on each subject, which can be then compared to data collected from healthy people. Any differences between the two groups could be a biomarker worthy of further research.

This approach is not cheap, the cost for each person included in the study is $ 70,000 (£48,200).

Davis had trouble raising funds from the usual funding bodies, so he had to collect funds privately. Unfortunately this meant he could not include the numbers originally planned for, and the study consists of three severely ill ME/CFS patients (one being his son) and 43 healthy controls.

Davis pointed out the importance of understanding the mechanism behind ME/CFS in his talk and said:

‘it [ME/CFS] could be fairly easy to fix, we just need to know what to do ’

Initial unpublished results presented during the conference suggested three possible biomarkers in severe ME/CFS:

  • Biotin a.k.a vitamin B7 – deficiency in biotin was found. It is normally manufactured by the human body or provided as a metabolite by bacteria in our gut.
  • Tryptophan – deficiency in tryptophan was found. This is an essential amino acid which the body cannot make. The deficiency was possibly caused by too much of a particular enzyme being present, which breaks down tryptophan.
  • Tetrahydrobiopterin a.k.a. BH4 – deficiency in BH4 was found. It is used in the synthesis of neurotransmitters serotonin and melatonin.

The results obtained also showed deficiencies, in the severley ill patients, of the citric acid cycle, which is one of the major pathways for energy production in the body. Davis is hopeful that some of the findings, once verified, will be useful in people less severely ill with ME/CFS. The current set of data, which will eventually be made publicly available, Davis hopes will enable easier funding for the next steps of his, and others, research into ME/CFS.

Where do we go from here?

There was a positive vibe present as the conference ended, Gibson was very happy with how the conference went, saying:

‘it was a real step change in biomedical understanding of ME. The public were here, their carers and patient groups really felt something is happening, it gave them encouragement which is what it is all about. For too long they have suffered the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune, and now it is beginning to change.’

Gibson predicted that a pharma company will come “knocking on the door” in two years time, and thought the involvement of Professor Ron Davis in the field was a significant step:

‘Ron who is a big molecular biologist from Stanford, loads of money, loads of support, knows everybody, is a real find and he will bring people on board.’

Throughout the conference people emphasised bringing younger people into this field of research as being important, and a number of PhD students presented their results to emphasise this was happening.

Attempts to overturn entrenched negative views of ME/CFS within the medical community were also discussed, and the importance of educating the next generation of medics into the sound science supporting a ‘physical’ cause for ME/CFS.

A critical mass is a term often used to describe a sufficiently large collection of people and resources which enables a tipping point to be reached where serious progress can be made in a particular field.

This conference felt very much like that critical mass is fast approaching, if not already here, and the next few years could provide some ground breaking work into understanding and treating ME/CFS. As always funding will be tough to get, but the excellent research being produced now will provide a solid base for research funding claims in the future.

Get involved

Donate money to the charity Invest in ME Research via The Big Give or Just Giving campaigns

Featured image via Invest in Me Research, artwork by Wolfgang Stiller

Posted in News | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on People with ME/CFS have long been told it’s all in their head – these scientists disagree

The Microbe Discovery Project

The Microbe Discovery Project makes a plea for donations.

It is a patient-led initiative supporting Dr. Ian Lipkin & Dr. Mady Hornig’s ME/CFS research at the Columbia University Center for Infection and Immunity, Mailman School of Public Health, New York.

“ME/CFS is a global problem that we need to address – it robs people of the most productive years of their lives, it causes immunological dysfunction, profound fatigue, cognitive dysfunction. It really destroys peoples’ lives. It is underappreciated, it is underfunded, and with your support we hope to find solutions to this crippling problem”. ~Dr. Ian Lipkin

Dr. Lipkin, Director of the Columbia University Center for Infection and Immunity and Dr. Hornig, Director of Translational Research and their team are actively engaged in state-of-the-art research into ME/CFS. They aim to provide insights into the disease that will lead to the development of diagnostic tests and eventual treatments.

They have already produced a landmark study that showed that the cytokine profile of ME/CFS patients is abnormal and changes markedly after three years, providing more robust evidence of the biological basis of ME/CFS. These findings made international headlines, also being reported in the New York Times and The Wall Street Journal.

These researchers are constantly building on their current program of work, are collaborative and known creative problem solvers: just look at their exceptional work in this article ‘Hunting down the cause of ME/CFS and & other challenging disorders’ by Simon McGrath. They are keen to start working on biomarker validation studies and develop an ME Center of Excellence! This team has strong ambitions and an equally strong ability to achieve these and have committed a significant percentage of their resources at CII into an ME/CFS program of research.

In fact, Dr. Lipkin recently stated that he believes that we can solve ME/CFS in 3 to 5 years provided the resources are made available, see Cort Johnson’s impressive article about Dr. Lipkin’s talk at a recent Simmaron Research event.

Current program of ME/CFS research

Analyisis and Testing

The researchers are working on figuring out one of the central problems in ME/CFS: “heterogeneity”. This basically means there are probably many different subgroups of patients, some of who are likely to have different diseases, all caught under the current ME/CFS umbrella. The team are working with 5 different ME/CFS specialist clinicians at different sites across the US, along with other US researchers. They hope that the foundation they develop for a Center of Excellence in ME will ultimately have a global component.

They are implementing cutting edge technology and science looking into pathogen discovery; immune signatures; gene expression and variants; antibodies to viruses, bacteria and fungi that lead to autoimmune type of responses as well as phage approaches for anti-pathogen antibodies.

Other high-tech approaches, some of which where developed by Dr. Lipkin and his lab include, MassTag PCR – High throughput sequencing, the new VircapSeq – VERT test, a 51 cytokine and chemokine immunoassay panel, metabolomics and proteomics.

They are investigating the oral pharyngeal (mouth and throat) and gut microbiome, spinal fluid and analysing gene expression. This is a phenomenal amount of work involving many people with carefully characterized cohorts from the ME/CFS expert clinicians that they collaborate with. The programme entails a huge amount of investigation and discovery. The research will help reveal the molecular detail of what might be going wrong for people with ME/CFS.

Cohorts

Pure Pathogen Discovery Projects:

National Institutes of Health/NIAID 150 cases, 150 controls: blinded multisite viral analysis (XMRV/pLMV) Samples still banked, able to be used.

With Dr Montoya, Stanford University 400 cases, 400 controls: pathogen discovery

Chronic Fatigue Initiative 200 cases, 200 controls: pathogen discovery, immune signatures, metabolomics, proteomics. Subset of  50/50 controls: microbiome, longitudinal immune analysis (12 – 18 months after 1st sampling )

Other Projects:

Cerebro spinal fluid study, with Dr Petersen 60 cases, 60 multiple sclerosis/no disease controls: pathogen discovery, immune signatures, proteomics and metabolomics. Cerebrospinal fluid bathes the brain, and these samples give a unique window on what’s happening in the brain.

Dr Peterson “unusual” cases 9 cases, 9 matched controls: pathogen discovery

Large Microbiome/Immunity Study:

National Institutes of Health/NINDS/Microbe Discovery Project (in progress) 125 cases, 125 matched controls: sample collection for microbiome and immunity, blood, stool and saliva at 4 time points; pathogen discovery analysis; foundation for establishment of Center of Excellence for ME. Collection has been funded through NINDS and donations as well as heavily subsidized by CII.

$5 million is needed for tests and analysis for this very large, extensive Microbiome/ Immunity study. How to donate

See the resources page for more background information and links.

Posted in News | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on The Microbe Discovery Project

Systematic review of drug therapies for CFS/ME finds no drugs universally effective

Review abstract:

Purpose:

The pathogenesis of chronic fatigue syndrome or myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME) is complex and remains poorly understood. Evidence regarding the use of drug therapies in CFS/ME is currently limited and conflicting. The aim of this systematic review was to examine the existing evidence on the efficacy of drug therapies and determine whether any can be recommended for patients with CFS/ME.

Methods:

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed databases were searched from the start of their records to March 2016 to identify relevant studies. Randomized controlled trials focusing solely on drug therapy to aleviate and/or eliminate chronic fatigue symptoms were included in the review. Any trials that considered graded exercise therapy, cognitive behavior therapy, adaptive pacing, or any other nonpharmaceutical treatment plans were excluded. The inclusion criteria were examined to ensure that study participants met specific CFS/ME diagnostic criteria. Study size, intervention, and end point outcome domains were summarized.

Findings: A total of 1039 studies were identified with the search terms; 26 studies met all the criteria and were considered suitable for review. Three different diagnostic criteria were identified: the Holmes criteria, International Consensus Criteria, and the Fukuda criteria. Primary outcomes were identified as fatigue, pain, mood, neurocognitive dysfunction and sleep quality, symptom severity, functional status, and well-being or overall health status. Twenty pharmaceutical classes were trialed. Ten medications were shown to be slightly to moderately effective in their respective study groups (P o 0.05).

Implications: These findings indicate that no universal pharmaceutical treatment can be recommended. The unknown etiology of CFS/ME, and complications arising from its heterogeneous nature, contributes to the lack of clear evidence for pharmaceutical interventions.

However, patients report using a large number and variety of medications. This finding highlights the need for trials with clearly defined CFS/ME cohorts. Trials based on more specific criteria such as the International Consensus Criteria are recommended to identify specific subgroups of patients in whom treatments may be beneficial.

A Systematic Review of Drug Therapies for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/Myalgic Encephalomyelitis by Ansel Collatz MPH, Samantha C. Johnston MIPH, MHEcon, PhD, Donald R. Staines, MBBS, MPH, FAFPHM, FAFOEM, Sonya M. Marshall-Gradisnik, BSc (Hons), PhD in Clin Ther. 2016 May 23. pii  [Epub ahead of print]

 

Posted in News | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Systematic review of drug therapies for CFS/ME finds no drugs universally effective

Carers week 2016 – carers need supportive communities

Carers Week is an annual campaign to raise awareness of caring, highlight the challenges carers face and recognise the contribution they make to families and communities throughout the UK.

Carers Week JPGCarers Week 6-12 June 2016

The life chances of many of the 6.5 million people in the UK who care, unpaid, for a disabled, older or ill family member or friend, are being damaged by inadequate support from local services, according to new research launched for Carers Week 2016.
What’s more, when carers face a lack of understanding about their caring role from the overall community, the negative impact on their health, wellbeing, relationships and finances is exacerbated.

Three-quarters of carers (74%) with some of the most intensive caring responsibilities say their community does not understand or value their caring role, resulting in high numbers of carers struggling to balance other areas of their lives alongside caring.

One carer said:

“As a carer attempting to get understanding, advice, support and emergency care from the ‘community’ – such as GP, public transport, social services, dentist pharmacies and hospitals – it can be very challenging, exhausting and beyond stressful.”

Mixed support from local services means that the majority of carers are facing barriers to maintaining their health, balancing work and care, and balancing education and care3, which is having a markedly negatively impact on their life chances:

  • Over half of carers (51%) have let a health problem go untreated
  • Half of carers (50%) have seen their mental health get worse
  • Two thirds of carers (66%) have given up work or reduced their hours to care
  • Almost half of carers (47%) have struggled financially
  • Almost one third of carers (31%) only get help when it is an emergency

One carer said:

“I find my care needs pushed further and further away until they break down completely and become an emergency. Last time this happened, I was in hospital for 10 days.”

The Carers Week research shows that when carers are supported by their community, they face far fewer barriers to having a life outside of their caring role:

  • Carers who are supported by their communities are three times more likely to always be able to maintain a healthy lifestyle (27% compared with 9%)
  • Carers who are supported by their communities are three times more likely to always be able to maintain relationships with close friends and family (29% compared with 9%)
  • Carers who are not supported by their communities are more than twice as likely to never be able to balance work with care (35% compared with 15%)
  • Carers who are not supported by their communities are more than twice as likely to never be able to balance education with care (47% compared with 23%)

Emily Holzhausen, who leads the Carers Week partnership, said:

“Carers have told us that it makes a huge difference to their lives when they are supported by their local services and communities; whether that’s being offered a flexible appointment to see their GP, having flexible working policies from their employers, or their school raising awareness of caring and disability.

“Despite this, the majority of carers told us that their local community was not supportive of their caring role, which in turn is having a significant and negatively impact on their life chances.

“This report comes at an opportune moment, with a new Carers’ Strategy in development in England, and new governments forming across Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. We’re calling on individuals, organisations and governments to think about what they can do to improve the lives of carers in their community.”

Building Carer Friendly Communities: research report for Carers Week 2016

 

Posted in News | Tagged | Comments Off on Carers week 2016 – carers need supportive communities

Gene expression factor analysis used to differentiate CFS, FM and depression

Research abstract:

OBJECTIVE:

To determine if independent candidate genes can be grouped into meaningful biologic factors, and whether these factors are associated with the diagnosis of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) and fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS), while controlling for comorbid depression, sex, and age.

METHODS:

We included leukocyte messenger RNA gene expression from a total of 261 individuals, including healthy controls (n = 61), patients with FMS only (n = 15), with CFS only (n = 33), with comorbid CFS and FMS (n = 79), and with medication-resistant (n = 42) or medication-responsive (n = 31) depression. We used exploratory factor analysis (EFA) on 34 candidate genes to determine factor scores and regression analysis to examine whether these factors were associated with specific diagnoses.

RESULTS:

EFA resulted in 4 independent factors with minimal overlap of genes between factors, explaining 51% of the variance. We labeled these factors by function as 1) purinergic and cellular modulators, 2) neuronal growth and immune function, 3) nociception and stress mediators, and 4) energy and mitochondrial function. Regression analysis predicting these biologic factors using FMS, CFS, depression severity, age, and sex revealed that greater expression in factors 1 and 3 was positively associated with CFS and negatively associated with depression severity (Quick Inventory for Depression Symptomatology score), but not associated with FMS.

CONCLUSION:

Expression of candidate genes can be grouped into meaningful clusters, and CFS and depression are associated with the same 2 clusters, but in opposite directions, when controlling for comorbid FMS. Given high comorbid disease and interrelationships between biomarkers, EFA may help determine patient subgroups in this population based on gene expression

Gene Expression Factor Analysis to Differentiate Pathways Linked to Fibromyalgia, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, and Depression in a Diverse Patient Sample, by E Iacob, AR Light AR, GW Donaldson, A Okifuji, RW Hughen, AT White, KC Light in Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2016 Jan;68(1):132-40.

Posted in News | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Gene expression factor analysis used to differentiate CFS, FM and depression

The social media experiences of long-term patients with ME in Norway

Research abstract:

The present article investigates the meanings of social media use for long-term patients, focusing on a group of Norwegian bloggers diagnosed with myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME). This severe illness can confine patients to their homes for long periods of time, drastically reducing possibilities to participate on most social arenas and leaving Internet
use as a rare opportunity for connection with the outside world.

A qualitative analysis of interviews with ME bloggers investigates the meanings of social media use in this particular situation. Drawing on perspectives from research on patients’ Internet use, this phenomenon is analysed as management of identity narratives in the face of illness.

However, the article further argues that the concept of participation provides a relevant supplementary perspective that highlights the societal and political relevance of these practices.

The social media experiences of long-term patients: Illness, identity, and participation, by Brita Ytre-Arne in Nordicom Review Vol. 37, no. 1, pp 15-28, May 31, 2016

 

Posted in News | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on The social media experiences of long-term patients with ME in Norway

Mast cell disease activation

Health rising Book review by Remy, 9 May 2016: Mast Cell Activation Disease – The Modern Epidemics of Chronic illness, by Afrin

My hope is that people will read this book and get tested to find out if they are in the subgroup of ME/CFS that might benefit from this approach to treatment. This book provides an excellent primer for the self-starters among us as well as the open-minded physician who is willing to learn.

Allergies are not just itching and trouble breathing or caused by hay fever, bee stings or reactions to shellfish and peanuts. While these are the most common manifestations of allergies, an entirely different allergic process can affect literally every system in your body.

In fact, it can produce among the strangest and widest variety of symptoms of any disease. So many that the people afflicted with these kinds of allergies usually utterly baffle their doctors. Most doctors don’t know anything about them and they are rarely diagnosed. They’re caused by a disorder called Mast Cell Activation Syndrome (MCAS) which features mast cells gone a little crazy.

So what are mast cells?
That is one of the questions that Dr Lawrence Afrin, a leading expert in the field of mast cell diseases, answers in the new book, “Never Bet Against Occam: Mast Cell Activation Disease and the Modern Epidemics of Chronic Illness and Medical Complexity”.

Dr. Lawrence Afrin is a board certified hematologist/oncologist who earned his MD at the Medical University of South Carolina, and then worked at the University of Minnesota’s Masonic Cancer Center. He wrote the book to highlight this new syndrome and help both doctors and people who suffer begin to identify and treat it better.

Dr. Afrin writes that mast cells “serve largely as sentinels of environmental change and bodily insults”. When those insults occur, they “respond by releasing large and variable assortments of molecular mediators.” These mediators then directly and indirectly influence the behavior of local and distant cells and tissues in order to “maintain, or restore, homeostasis.”

In English, that means mast cells are really common and really important. So much so that they’re often called the master regulators of the immune system. Mast cells come from the bone marrow and are filled with sacs of chemical mediators. Histamine is the most commonly known mediator but there are countless others.

Mast cells also play an important role in the body’s first line of defense. Their signals recruit other players in the immune system response and help to keep us healthy and free from disease.

Unless it all starts to go wrong.

Systemic Matocytosis (SM)

The closest most doctors come to mast cells in medical school is a disease called Systemic Mastocytosis (SM) They are taught that this rare disease will reveal itself through characteristic staining patterns of mast cells found during a bone marrow biopsy. Other criteria for diagnosis of SM include elevation of an enzyme called tryptase or identification of a genetic mutation called KIT.

Dr Afrin began to suspect that some portion of mast cell disease might be due to the inappropriate release of chemical mediators release from a normal counts of mast cells rather than increased numbers of mast cells (SM). Afrin’s hypothesis laid the groundwork for the identification of a spectrum of diseases that make up what is now called Mast Cell Activation Disorder (MCAD).

The markers used to diagnose SM are typically not all that helpful in MCAS. Tryptase, for example, is most often normal. Bone marrow biopsies do not always show the characteristic clumping of mast cells required to meet the diagnostic criteria. Other blood and urine tests may or may not reveal abnormalities. Many tests often need to be repeated during times of a “flare” in symptoms to see the changes characteristic of mast cell diseases. Poor handling of specimens by the laboratory is also a very real issue impeding mast cell disease diagnosis.

But Dr Afrin shows in “Never Bet Against Occam” that MCAD is a “real” illness that can effect virtually every system in the body. He does this by presenting a series of case studies that demonstrates how MCAD looks.

The typical MCAD patient he portrays is very ill and has been written off by the rest of the medical establishment as more trouble than they are worth. Not only does Afrin argue that MCAD is a “real” illness, he believes that it’s epidemic. Early research suggests that as much as 14-17% of the population may be affected, that’s one out of every 6-7 individuals.

Symptoms
So what are the symptoms of MCAD anyway? Could you have MCAD? Do you have typical “allergic” symptoms like flushing? Itchiness? Dizziness? Or GI symptoms like diarrhea, cramping, constipation or nausea? Or less commonly considered allergic symptoms like brain fog?

How about migraines? Sinus infections? Congestion? Dry, gritty eyes? Bone density problems? Bleeding abnormalities – blood either too thick or too thin? Easy bruising? POTS? Orthostatic intolerance? Fatigue? Food, drug, and chemical sensitivities? Feel cold a lot? UTIs/Interstitial Cystitis? Arthritis? Muscle and/or joint pain? Cardiac abnormalities?

Then, perhaps welcome to MCAD! No body system is immune from the effects of this inflammatory disease. Let that statement sink in for a few moments. Read it again, if necessary. Every single system in the body can be affected by aberrant mast cell activity.

Complicated Disease

To further complicate matters, mast cells don’t always activate the same cytokines in every person. In fact, they very rarely present the same in the same way twice (though there are many commonalities) and can actually cause opposite effects from one patient to the next.

An example of this dichotomy is a patient with hypercoagulable, sticky, thick blood and the next patient who presents with blood clotting problems, both of which, Afrin argues, can be caused by MCAD.

It’s worth noting that mast cells can also cause immune system abnormalities. Hypogammaglobulinemia is common in MCAD; hypergammaglobulinemia less so, but possible. Many people with MCAD are incorrectly diagnosed with Common Variable Immune Deficiency, a condition characterized by low levels of immunoglobulins and a decrease in antibody response to provocation. Many with MCAD also have a long history of infections in their medical files.

Dr Afrin notes that mast cells can produce basically any and all interleukins known to man (which may go some way towards explaining why no one can find really good data on cytokine production in diseases like ME/CFS.)

Dr Afrin relies on and credits a database called COPE created by Dr Horst Ibelgaufts for helping him to connect the dots between seemingly disparate symptoms. (As a side note, I highly recommend supporting this database as well. Dr Ibelgaufts may look a little bit like a serial killer on the Home page, but his work is truly staggering in comprehensiveness and complexity.)

Diagnosis

So how is MCAD diagnosed then if so many body systems are involved and typical markers for SM aren’t all that helpful? The most common tests Dr Afrin uses to diagnose MCAD are those that measure mast cell mediators. They include plasma histamine, n-methylhistamine (24-hr urine), prostaglandins PGD2 and/or 11-b-PGF2a (24-hour urine) (avoid NSAIDs for 5+ days prior), serum chromogranin A (avoid PPIs for 5+ days before testing), plasma heparin (not if on heparin products) and occasionally testing for leukotrienes.

These are not tests general practitioners are typically familiar with and many require special handling and chilling to prevent degradation of the fleeting mast cell mediators.

Therefore, if there is a strong clinical suspicion of MCAD, it may be necessary to repeat the testing several times before happening upon the positive result that confirms the diagnosis.

So you’ve been diagnosed with MCAD, what’s next?

Treatment

Antihistamine Drugs

Unfortunately, treatment is mostly by trial and error though many patients do ultimately see a significant amount of symptomatic relief.

Typically, treatment is focused on reducing the mast cell activity and blocking histamine at the H1 and H2 receptors with antihistamine drugs such as Claritin, Zyrtec or Allegra. Famotidine (Pepcid) is often used as an H2 blocker because it has fewer drug interactions than cimetidine (Tagamet) but either will work.

Often times, antihistamines are taken in 2-3 x’s the OTC recommended dose in divided doses. There are synergistic effects from taking H1 and H2 blockers together as well that are not achieved by taking either alone. Dr Afrin provides detailed dosing guidelines in his chapters on treatment.

Mast Cell Stabilizers
Many patients also find that taking a mast cell stabilizer to keep mast cells from acting up is helpful. Some antihistamines, like ketotifen, also have mast cell stabilizing properties. Ketotifen is currently only available in the USA through a compounding pharmacy though it is widely and cheaply available elsewhere in the world as Zaditor.

Cromolyn sodium (Gastrocrom) is the best known example of a pharmaceutical mast cell mediator. It’s available by prescription as oral vials or a nasal spray (NasalCrom). Some people report difficulties starting cromolyn sodium though due to a temporary flaring of symptoms and it is recommended to work up slowly to a final, therapeutic dose. It may take many months to see the benefit of cromolyn sodium treatment because of this.

Quercetin is a mast cell mediator that is available in a supplement form. Quercetin is practically insoluble in water though so I think it is helpful to choose a form that has been modified to be water soluble for enhanced absorption. (Dr Afrin does not specify any particular form, however.) Studies have shown quercetin to be equivalent to sodium cromolyn for the purposes of mast cell stabilization. Typical doses seem to range from 500-2000 mg/day.

There are other examples of classes of medications that are occasionally found to be helpful. Some of these include tyrosine kinase inhibitors like imatinib or leukotriene inhibitors like montelukast (Singulair). JAK inhibitors are a new class of medications that may or may not prove useful in treating MCAD as well as TNF blockers. NSAIDs, like aspirin, and benzodiazepines may also have a role in MCAD management. Some patients find improvement, especially with pain symptoms, with hydroxyurea.

Trigger Avoidance

Most people with MCAD instinctively learn to avoid their triggers whether they are aware of it or not. Strong smells, heat, and chemicals all can trigger reactions and most patients do better when they avoid these triggers. Some MCAD sufferers have also employed neural retraining techniques to help keep stress from exacerbating mast cell degranulation.

Diet
The Low Histamine Chef – The Anti Diet (Food as Medicine) – YouTube
Diet has also been found to play a role in treatment with some patients finding improvement in symptoms after adopting a low-histamine diet. Yasmina Ykelenstam’s blog, The Low Histamine Chef, is a good example of someone who has experienced significant symptom relief through dietary changes.

Some patients have their medications compounded to be free of fillers and artificial colors and find that their medications miraculously start working for them instead of against them for once. Dr Afrin does not recommend any particular diet at this point, though, other than to eat as healthy and balanced of a diet as possible.

Unfortunately, at this point treatment of MCAD is all about symptom management. Dr Afrin hopes that someday this will not be the case but until much more research is done, we are a long way from that point. The good news is that most people generally are able to find a combination of medications that will provide significant symptom relief and many are again able to return to normal lives from debilitating levels of disability and illness.

Genetic Fragility?

Dr Afrin wraps up “Never Bet Against Occam” by discussing the genetics of mast cell disease. Not much is known currently but some mast cell mutations have been identified with more surely to follow.

The mast cell gene that has been studied the most in SM is called KIT. KIT regulates the mast cell’s ability to survive, move, grow – and activate, according to Dr Afrin. The KIT gene is not limited to mast cells though. It is also found in many other type of cells because of its corresponding protein, tyrosine kinase.

Tyrosine kinases regulate growth and differentiation of cells. This may be why drugs like imatinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, have shown some clinical utility in MCAD. Dr Afrin believes that most cases of MCAD, like SM, are rooted in genetic mutations, but concedes that the science is sparse and that this question has yet to be decided.

Interestingly, Dr Afrin also notes that MCAD patients often find that the disease “steps up” its baseline level of activation misbehavior after exposure to some sort of stressor. Dr Afrin hypothesizes that patients may possess one or more inheritable “genetic fragility factors” which interact with different stressors like infection or other traumas to cause the occurrence of even more (non-inheritable) mutations which lead to the wide variety of confounding random mutations that occur later in illness, seemingly at random.

“Never Bet Against Occam” is 480 pages long, which seems overwhelming at first blush, but Afrin’s writing style is more colloquial at times than scientific. I still spent some time looking new terms or concepts up, but the book kept my interest easily and I finished it much more quickly than other “medical” books of similar lengths. There is also a comprehensive glossary that includes phonetic pronunciations for many unfamiliar words.When you think about it, the book almost by definition HAS to be that long to encompass the dizzying (literally!) array of symptoms that can be traced back to mast cell activation.

 

Posted in News | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Mast cell disease activation

Doing research in ME/CFS with ME/CFS

Article introduction:

My name is Dr. Keith Geraghty, I am an Honorary Research Fellow at the University of Manchester in the Centre for Primary Care. My main research interests are patient safety and harms, doctor-patient relations, medically unexplained illness and ME/CFS research.

So how did I get involved in CFS research? Well, I am one of the estimated 250,000 sufferers of ME/CFS in the UK. There is no doubt that ME, or CFS, whether one illness or discrete conditions, are life changing conditions for many; but it’s also very challenging from a research perspective, not just because the illness is enigmatic and complex, but because of many other factors, some of which I hope to articulate here, sharing my experience as both a CFS researcher and a CFS sufferer…

Read Keith’s story

The future

Today I find myself busy reading papers as usual, writing research grant applications, dealing with paper submissions and the review process; including attempting to convince editors and journals to accept my papers (all part of normal academic activities).

I use every opportunity to connect with other researchers; I think this is a vital part of research, particularly in CFS were there are perhaps less researchers. I also really enjoy connecting with patients, I often share my draft papers with patients and ask for their opinions prior to submission – I think this is a model other researchers should adopt.

I haven’t conquered every barrier in CFS research and there are many, both personal and professional, but I am making progress, mostly through hard work and determination. In the next year or two I hope to publish more widely and establish myself as a leading CFS researcher in the UK. Maybe in the future I will be able to offer support to other CFS researchers who might be looking to come into this challenging research field.

Dr. Geraghty is interested in collaborating with others on new or existing ME/CFS projects, especially in Europe but also elsewhere. He may be contacted at:
mailto:keith.geraghty@manchester.ac.uk

Doing Research in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, by Dr. Keith Geraghty, in IACFSME newsletter, May 2016

 

 

 

 

Posted in News | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Doing research in ME/CFS with ME/CFS

Finnish patients & health workers asked: What is a disease?

Research abstract:

Objective: To assess the perception of diseases and the willingness to use public-tax revenue for their treatment among relevant stakeholders.

Design: A population-based, cross-sectional mailed survey.
Setting: Finland.

Participants: 3000 laypeople, 1500 doctors, 1500 nurses (randomly identified from the databases of the Finnish Population Register, the Finnish Medical Association and the Finnish Nurses Association) and all 200 parliament members.

Main outcome measures: Respondents ’ perspectives on a five-point Likert scale on two claims on 60 states of being: ‘ (This state of being) is a disease ’ ; and ‘ (This state of being) should be treated with public tax revenue ’ .

Results: Of the 6200 individuals approached, 3280 (53%) responded. Of the 60 states of being, ≥ 80% of respondents considered 12 to be diseases (Likert scale responses of ‘ 4 ’ and ‘ 5 ’ ) and five not to be diseases (Likert scale responses of ‘ 1 ’ and ‘ 2 ’ ). There was considerable variability in most states, and great variability in 10 ( ≥ 20% of respondents of all groups considered it a disease and ≥ 20% rejected as a disease).

Doctors were more inclined to consider states of being as diseases than laypeople; nurses and members were intermediate (p<0.001), but all groups showed large variability. Responses to the two claims were very strongly correlated (r=0.96 (95% CI 0.94 to 0.98); p<0.001).

Conclusions: There is large disagreement among the public, health professionals and legislators regarding the classification of states of being as diseases and whether their management should be publicly funded. Understanding attitudinal differences can help to enlighten social discourse on a number of contentious public policy issues.

What is a disease? Perspectives of the public, health professionals and legislators (includes CFS), by Kari A O Tikkinen, Janne S Leinonen, Gordon H Guyatt, Shanil Ebrahim, Teppo L N Järvinen in BMJ Open  2012; 2:e001632
Pheonix Rising forum post by AB, 13 May 2016: What is a disease? Perspectives of the public, health professionals and legislators (includes CFS)

Participants were asked about their views on chronic fatigue syndrome. Opinions are divided on CFS. Note how similar the views are on work exhaustion. Nurses clearly consider work exhaustion to be more of a disease than CFS, although CFS has fewer people overall that strongly disagree with the idea that it’s a disease. Members of parliament are more likely to view CFS as disease, about 2/3 expressing agreement with the idea.

This study was conducted in Finland so the results may not be generalizable to other countries.

 

Posted in News | Tagged , | Comments Off on Finnish patients & health workers asked: What is a disease?

Prof Jason’s video lecture to undergrads on ME & CFS

Published on 22 Apr 2016

Leonard A. Jason’s lecture regarding his work in the ME and CFS arenas, presented to an undergraduate class at DePaul University.

Posted in News | Tagged , | Comments Off on Prof Jason’s video lecture to undergrads on ME & CFS