Sleep problems in adolescents with CFS: a case-control study nested within a prospective clinical cohort

Sleep problems in adolescents with CFS: A case-control study nested within a prospective clinical cohort, by Maria Elizabeth Loades, Katharine A Rimes, Trudie Chalder in Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, May 22 2020 [doi.org/10.1177/1359104520918364]

 

Research abstract:

Sleep problems have a negative impact on a range of outcomes and are very common in adolescents with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). We aimed to (a) establish whether adolescents with CFS have more self-reported sleep problems than illness controls as well as healthy controls, (b) investigate changes in sleep problems and (c) explore the extent to
which sleep problems at baseline predict fatigue and functioning at follow-up in adolescents with CFS.

The Insomnia Scale was completed by 121 adolescents with CFS, 78 healthy adolescents and 27 adolescents with asthma. Eighty (66%) treatment-naive adolescents with CFS completed questionnaires approximately 3 months later.

Adolescents with CFS reported increased sleep problems compared to healthy controls and adolescents with asthma. In CFS, there was no significant change in sleep problems without treatment over a 3-month follow-up. Sleep problems at baseline predicted a significant proportion of the variance in sleep problems at follow-up. Sleep problems should be targeted in treatment. Regulating the ‘body clock’ via the regulation of sleep could influence outcomes not assessed in this study such as school attainment.

Read full paper

Posted in News | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Sleep problems in adolescents with CFS: a case-control study nested within a prospective clinical cohort

Review of the quality control checks performed by current genome-wide & targeted-genome association studies on ME/CFS

Review of the quality control checks performed by current genome-wide and targeted-genome association studies on Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, by Nuno Sepulveda, Anna D Grabowska, Eliana M Lacerda, Luis C Nacul in Frontiers in Pediatrics. May 7, 2020 [doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.00293 ]

 

Research article Introduction:

Myalgic encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) is a debilitating disease characterized by persistent fatigue and post-exertion malaise, accompanied by other symptoms. The direct cause of the disease remains elusive, but it may include genetic factors alongside environmental triggers, such as strong microbial infections and other stressors.

Aiming to identify putative genetic factors that could explain the pathophysiological mechanisms of ME/CFS, four genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and two targeted-genome association studies (TGAS) were conducted in the past decade (5–10). In the four GWAS, thousands of genetic markers located across the whole genome were evaluated for their statistical association with ME/CFS (5–8). The two TGAS had the same statistical objective of the four GWAS, but alternatively investigated the association of the disease with numerous genetic markers located in candidate genes related to inflammation and immunity (9) and in genes encoding diverse adrenergic receptors (10).

The findings from all these different studies suggested conflicting evidence of genetic association with ME/CFS: from absence of association (7), through mild association (10) up to moderate associations of a relatively small number of genetic markers (5,6,9). The most optimistic GWAS suggested more than 5,500 candidate gene-disease associations (8).

This inconsistency in the reported findings prompted us to review the respective data. With this purpose, the present opinion paper first revisits the recommended quality control (QC) checks for GWAS and TGAS, and then summarizes which ones were performed by those studies on ME/CFS…

Discussion

This opinion paper shows partial QC checks in the majority of the published genetic association studies on ME/CFS, the exception being the study carried out by Herrera et al (7). The assessment of the performed QC checks is essential to ascertain the quality of the respective genetic data. In this regard, the genetic data from Perez et al (8) deserves to be further analysed to ascertain the validity of the reported findings. Such assessment can follow the QC steps outlined here and exemplary performed by Herrera et al (7). The remaining studies can also benefit by an additional quality check related to heterozygosity rate so that possible sample contaminations can be ruled out.

The absence of this check does not immediately invalidate the genetic data of these studies. We could have done such check if the corresponding genetic data were available either in an open-access repository or as a supplementary file within the respective publication, a data-sharing practice followed by several ME/CFS researchers (13–15).

Consequently, it is unclear whether aberrant heterozygosity rates (due to sample contamination) are one of the explanations for the conflicting evidence of genetic associations reported by these studies. In this regard, Herrera et al (7) excluded five out of their 109 samples (5%) based on the heterozygosity rate. In simple statistical applications using large sample sizes, a 5% sample contamination might be too low to have a substantial impact on the respective findings. However, in the specific context of GWAS and TGAS where stringent significance levels are used to control for multiple testing, such a level of sample contamination could reduce the underlying statistical power and leave relevant disease-gene associations undetected.

Besides the partial QC checks, the investigated genetic data on ME/CFS suffer from the curse of not having an objective biomarker for disease diagnosis. Similar problem can be envisioned for other complex diseases lacking a biomarker, such as Fibromyalgia and the Gulf War Syndrome. The absence of a biomarker is likely to introduce a possible misclassification of the true disease status of the recruited patients (16). To illustrate this putative problem, Herrera et al (7) recruited nine obese (with body mass indexes equal or higher than 35 kg/m2) out of 61 patients based on the Centre for Diseases Control Criteria (1) and Canadian Consensus Criteria (2). Notwithstanding controlling for the body mass index in the respective association analysis and the exclusion of known diseases, it is unclear whether the obesity observed in these patients was a direct consequence of ME/CFS or instead caused by another ongoing disease strongly associated with fatigue.

A solution to this problem is to use more advanced statistical methodology where misclassification can be directly included in the data analysis (17,18). However, given the complexity of this methodology, we argue that a stronger collaboration between the ME/CFS research community and statistical geneticists should be reached. In principle, this collaboration is expected to promote better statistical analyses, to improve data interpretations and, ultimately, a better assessment of the genetic component in ME/CFS.

In summary, given the partial QC checks performed in current GWAS and TGAS, the question of a genetic component in ME/CFS remains open for investigation. To accelerate the discovery of promising disease-gene association, future genetic studies of ME/CFS should set data and methodological standards as high as those followed by the 1000 Human Genome Project and the UK10K project (19,20). Data sharing should also be a general practice to provide the researcher community the opportunity to perform additional checks or alternative analyses of the same data.

Posted in News | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Review of the quality control checks performed by current genome-wide & targeted-genome association studies on ME/CFS

Systematic review of the epidemiological burden of ME/CFS across Europe: current evidence & EUROMENE research recommendations for epidemiology

Systematic review of the epidemiological burden of ME/CFS across Europe: current evidence and EUROMENE research recommendations for epidemiology, by Fernando Estévez-López, Kathleen Mudie, Xia Wang-Steverding, Inger Johanne Bakken, Andrejs Ivanovs, Jesús Castro-Marrero, Luis Nacul, Jose Alegre, Paweł Zalewski, Joanna Słomko, Elin Bolle Strand, Derek Pheby, Evelina Shikova, Lorenzo Lorusso, Enrica Capelli, Slobodan Sekulic, Carmen Scheibenbogen, Nuno Sepúlveda, Modra Murovska, and Eliana Lacerda, on behalf of The European Network on ME/CFS (EUROMENE) in J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9 (5), 1557; [https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9051557]

 

Review abstract:

This review aimed at determining the prevalence and incidence of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/ Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) in Europe. We conducted a primary search in Scopus, PubMed and Web of Science for publications between 1994 and 15 June 2019 (PROSPERO: CRD42017078688).

Additionally, we performed a backward- (reference lists) and forward-(citations) search of the works included in this review.

Grey literature was addressed by contacting all members of the European Network on ME/CFS (EUROMENE). Independent reviewers searched, screened and selected studies, extracted data and evaluated the methodological and reporting quality.

For prevalence, two studies in adults and one study in adolescents were included. Prevalence ranged from 0.1% to 2.2%. Two studies also included incidence estimates. In conclusion, studies on the prevalence and incidence of ME/CFS in Europe were scarce.

Our findings point to the pressing need for well-designed and statistically powered epidemiological studies.

To overcome the shortcomings of the current state-of-the-art, EUROMENE recommends that future research is better conducted in the community, reviewing the clinical history of potential cases, obtaining additional objective information (when needed) and using adequate ME/CFS case definitions; namely, the Centers for Disease Control & Prevention−1994, Canadian Consensus Criteria, or Institute of Medicine criteria

Excerpt from Conclusions:

Potential causes of this paucity of knowledge may be due to a European lack of (i) official disease recognition, (ii) consensus over case definitions, or (iii) investment by funding agencies, among others.

Posted in News | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Systematic review of the epidemiological burden of ME/CFS across Europe: current evidence & EUROMENE research recommendations for epidemiology

Heart rate thresholds to limit activity in ME/CFS patients (pacing): comparison of heart rate formulae

Heart rate thresholds to limit activity in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome patients (Pacing): Comparison of heart rate formulae and measurements of the heart rate at the lactic acidosis threshold during Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing, by C (Linda) MC van Campen, Peter C Rowe, Frans C Visser in Advances in Physical Education Vol. 10 No.2, May 2020 [DOI: 10.4236/ape.2020.102013]

 

 

Research abstract:

Introduction:

Based on the hypothesis that oxidative metabolism is impaired in ME/CFS, a previous study recommended a pacing self-management strategy to prevent post-exertional malaise. This strategy involved a prescription to maintain a heart rate below the anaerobic threshold during physical activities. In the absence of lactate sampling or a cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET), the pacing self-management formula defines 55% of the age-specific predicted maximal heart rate as the heart rate at the anaerobic threshold. Thus far there has been no empiric evidence to test this self-pacing method of predicting heart rate at anaerobic threshold.

The aim of this study was to compare published formula-derived heart rates at the anaerobic threshold with the actual heart rate at the lactic acidosis threshold as determined by CPET.

Methods and Results:

Adults with ME/CFS who had undergone a symptom-limited CPET were eligible for this study (30 males, 60 females). We analysed males and females separately because of sex-based differences in peak oxygen consumption. From a review paper, formulae to calculate maximal predicted heart rate were used for healthy subjects. We compared the actual heart rate at the lactic acid threshold during CPET to the predicted heart rates determined by formulae. Using Bland-Altman plots, calculated bias: the mean difference between the actual CPET heart rate at the anaerobic threshold and the formula predicted heart rate across several formulae varied between -28 and 19 bpm in male ME/CFS patients. Even in formulae with a clinically acceptable bias, the limits of agreement (mean bias ± 2SD) were unacceptably high for all formulae. For female ME/CFS patients, bias varied between 6 and 23 bpm, but the limits of agreement were also unacceptably high for all formulae.

Conclusion:

Formulae generated in an attempt to help those with ME/CFS exercise below the anaerobic threshold do not reliably predict actual heart rates at the lactic acidosis threshold as measured by a cardiopulmonary exercise test. Formulae based on age-dependent predicted peak heart rate multiplied by 55% have a wide age-specific variability and therefore have a limited application in clinical practice.

 

Todd Davenport of the Workwell Foundation responded to the conclusions of this study on twitter:

Todd Davenport‏ @sunsopeningband May 23

I think it’s important to point out the equation we proposed was never intended to accurately predict heart rate at VAT. It was intended to slightly under-estimate heart rate at ventilatory anaerobic threshold. The thought was this underestimation would provide a safety margin.

The authors of the present study, very helpfully, provide us with some important subject-level data in Figure 1. These data can help us get an idea of whether the formula we proposed in 2010 actually underestimates the heart rate at lactic acid threshold, as originally intended…

“All models are wrong. Some models are useful.” Formula based estimation for metabolic output using heart rate is fraught. We know there are additional problems with it from our work on chronotropic intolerance in #MECFS.

However, because (repeat) CPET measurements is still not a common evaluative assessment for people with #MECFS, patients and their physical therapists are left with few objective tools to monitor activity in our collective attempt to reduce post-exertional neuroimmune exhaustion.

Calculated values, for all their acknowledged problems with picking accurate values in single patients, still can be useful to help patients and clinicians select appropriate activity thresholds for pacing self management. The data from this study seems to support this premise.

Posted in News | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Heart rate thresholds to limit activity in ME/CFS patients (pacing): comparison of heart rate formulae

The feasibility & acceptability of an early intervention in primary care to prevent CFS in adults

The feasibility and acceptability of an early intervention in primary care to prevent chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) in adults: randomised controlled trial, by Hazel O’Dowd, Lucy Beasant, Jenny Ingram, Alan Montgomery, Will Hollingworth, Daisy Gaunt, Simon M Collin, Sarah Horne, Beth Jones, Esther Crawley in Pilot and Feasibility Studies Vol 6, #65, May 12 2020

 

Abstract

Background:
Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS, also known as myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME)) is defined as fatigue that is disabling, is accompanied by additional symptoms and persists for ≥ 4 months. Treatment of CFS/ME aims to help patients manage their symptoms and make lifestyle adjustments. We do not know whether intervening early in primary care (< 4 months after onset of fatigue) can prevent the development of CFS/ME.

Methods:
This was a feasibility randomised controlled trial with adults (age ≥ 18 years) comparing usual care with usual care plus an early intervention (EI; a combination of psycho-education and cognitive behavioural therapy, CBT). This study took place in fourteen primary care practices in Bristol, England and aimed to identify issues around recruitment and retention for a full-scale trial. It was not powered to support statistical analysis of differences in outcomes. Integrated qualitative methodology was used to explore the feasibility and acceptability of recruitment and randomisation to the intervention.

Results:
Forty-four patients were recruited (1 August 2012-November 28, 2013), falling short of our predicted recruitment rate of 100 patients in 8 months. Qualitative data from GPs showed recruitment was not feasible because it was difficult to identify potential participants within 4 months of symptom onset. Some referring GPs felt screening investigations recommended by NICE were unnecessary, and they had difficulty finding patients who met the eligibility criteria.

Qualitative data from some participant interviews suggested that the intervention was not acceptable in its current format. Although the majority of participants found parts of the intervention acceptable, many reported one or more problems with acceptability. Participants who discontinued the intervention or found it problematic did not relate to the therapeutic model, disliked telephone consultations or found self-reflection challenging.

Conclusions:
A randomised controlled trial to test an early intervention for fatigue in adults in primary care is not feasible using this intervention and recruitment strategy.

 

AfME CEO comment on early intervention study for CFS

“The study did not succeed and would not be the type of study that Action for M.E. would support now.”

 


 

Posted in News | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The feasibility & acceptability of an early intervention in primary care to prevent CFS in adults

Patients’ experiences and effects of non-pharmacological treatment for myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome – a scoping mixed methods review

Patients’ experiences and effects of non-pharmacological treatment for myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome – a scoping mixed methods review, by
Anne Marit Mengshoel, Ingrid Bergliot Helland, Mira Meeus, Jesus Castro-Marrero, Derek Pheby & Elin Bolle Strand in International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being Vol 15, 2020, no. 01

 

Review  abstract:

Purpose:
The EU COST Action 15111 collaboration on myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) aims to assess current research and identify knowledge gaps in Europe. Presently, our purpose is to map the effects of non-pharmacological therapies (NPTs) for ME/CFS, and what patients find important in the treatment process.

Methods:
A scoping mixed methods literature review of European studies identified 16 papers fulfilling our inclusion criteria. The quantitative and qualitative studies were synthesized separately in tables. Additionally, extracts from the qualitative studies were subjected to translational analysis.

Results:
Effect studies addressed cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT, n = 4), multimodal rehabilitation (n = 2) and activity-pacing (n = 2). CBT reduced fatigue scores more than usual care or waiting list controls. The effects of rehabilitation and activity-pacing were inconsistent. The contents, assessment methods and effects of rehabilitation and activity pacing studies varied. For patients, health professionals’ recognition of ME/CFS and support were crucial, but they expressed ambiguous experiences of what the NPTs entail.

Conclusions:
Methodological differences make comparisons across NPTs impossible, and from a patient perspective the relevance of the specific contents of NPTs are unclear. Future well-designed studies should focus on developing NPTs tailored to patients’ concerns and evaluation tools reflecting what is essential for patients.

 

Excerpt:

Methodological issues
The content and delivery of NPTs varied considerably in the studies, and any theoretical reasons for including the various components are not given. As NPTs are based on various theoretical assumptions, each NPT should first be tested to see if it is successful in achieving what it theoretically is supposed to do, and whether the changes are relevant in helping patients with ME/CFS. If successful in both respects, other components could be added step by step and tested in accordance with the framework of developing complex interventions (Craig et al., 2013; Richards & Hallberg, 2015). Future RCTs should also include long-time follow-up and cost-benefit analysis, and in particular, more studies on the role of NPTs for children and adolescents are needed.

The studies of CBT showed rather consistent results in having an effect on modifying fatigue, while the effects of activity pacing and multimodal rehabilitation were inconsistent. However, a timely question is whether the outcome measures were appropriate in evaluating whether the intentions of the NPTs, and what was found relevant for patients, were reached. At present, generic instruments, such as SF-36 and the CIS fatigue subscale, mostly assessed effects. A systematic literature review by Haywood et al. (2012) examined whether patient-reported measures, including those used in our review, had undergone rigorous, scientific evaluations in patients with ME/CFS. No evidence was found that patients had been involved in evaluating the relevance of any questionnaire, the content validities of which are therefore questionable. Likewise, measures showed little or moderate responsiveness to NPTs, which is essential in detecting effects. Another issue to be considered is how to interpret statistically significant differences in relation to clinical importance. It is questionable how much change is needed in an instrument’s scale to make it both clinically relevant and meaningful for patients (Angst et al., 2017). For future research, we recommend developing robust patient-reported disease-specific measures in collaboration with patients, and international consensus should be reached about the use of such instruments in making findings comparable across studies.

Patients with ME/CFS are not homogenous. Severely affected patients are house- or bedbound, while others, well represented in the effect studies we identified, struggle to maintain their living patterns. We did not find any studies on NPTs for severely affected patients. One reason for this may be that RCT designs are not appropriate in evaluating effects of such therapies for severely affected patients. To attempt to close this knowledge gap, case studies are high priority. Interviews with severely afflicted patients about their illness experiences, and interviews with patients that have become better after being bed- or house bond about what mattered for their progress, are needed to develop meaningful NPTs in the future. An alternative means of testing such new NPTs could be to apply single subject experimental designs in which a subject serves as his/her own control (Bates, 1996; Zhan & Ottenbacher, 2001). Patient-specific measures, such as Canadian Occupational Performance Measure as used by Kos et al. (Kos et al., 2015) can be appropriate to examine eventual progress but are less easy to use because of the semi-structured format. In terms of clinical practice, the semi-structured format has the advantage of being already a first step in the communication with the patients, but in research, reliability can be an issue when the assessors are not well trained.

Posted in News | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Patients’ experiences and effects of non-pharmacological treatment for myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome – a scoping mixed methods review

A systematic review of metabolomic dysregulation in CFS/ME/SEID

A systematic review of metabolomic dysregulation in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Systemic Exertion Intolerance Disease (CFS/ME/SEID), by Teilah Kathryn Huth, Natalie Eaton-Fitch, Donald Staines & Sonya Marshall-Gradisnik in Journal of Translational Medicine vol 18, no. 198 (2020)

Review abstract:

Background:
Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Systemic Exertion Intolerance Disease (CFS/ME/SEID) is a complex illness that has an unknown aetiology. It has been proposed that metabolomics may contribute to the illness pathogenesis of CFS/ME/SEID. In metabolomics, the systematic identification of measurable changes in small molecule metabolite products have been identified in cases of both monogenic and heterogenic diseases. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review was to evaluate if there is any evidence of metabolomics contributing to the pathogenesis of CFS/ME/SEID.

Methods:
PubMed, Scopus, EBSCOHost (Medline) and EMBASE were searched using medical subject headings terms for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, metabolomics and metabolome to source papers published from 1994 to 2020. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were used to identify studies reporting on metabolites measured in blood and urine samples from CFS/ME/SEID patients compared with healthy controls. The Joanna Briggs Institute Checklist was used to complete a quality assessment for all the studies included in this review.

Results:
11 observational case control studies met the inclusion criteria for this review. The primary outcome of metabolite measurement in blood samples of CFS/ME/SEID patients was reported in ten studies. The secondary outcome of urine metabolites was measured in three of the included studies. No studies were excluded from this review based on a low-quality assessment score, however there was inconsistency in the scientific research design of the included studies. Metabolites associated with the amino acid pathway were the most commonly impaired with significant results in seven out of the 10 studies. However, no specific metabolite was consistently impaired across all of the studies. Urine metabolite results were also inconsistent.

Conclusion:
The findings of this systematic review reports that a lack of consistency with scientific research design provides little evidence for metabolomics to be clearly defined as a contributing factor to the pathogenesis of CFS/ME/SEID. Further research using the same CFS/ME/SEID diagnostic criteria, metabolite analysis method and control of the confounding factors that influence metabolite levels are required.

Posted in News | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on A systematic review of metabolomic dysregulation in CFS/ME/SEID

Difficulties of living with an illness not considered a “Disease”: focusing on the illness behavior of ME/CFS patients

Difficulties of living with an illness not considered a “Disease”: Focusing on the illness behavior of myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome patients, by Natsuko Nojima in Departmental Bulletin Paper, Osaka Human Sciences Vol.6

 

Paper abstract:

This paper focuses on the illness behavior of patients with myalgic encephalomyelitis/ chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) to clarify difficulties in their lives through comparison with a five-stage model of illness behavior.

[Suchman is the one who describes the five stages of illness behavior namely: Symptoms, sick role, medical care contact, dependent client role, and recovery.] https://tinyurl.com/ycbldvx8

ME/CFS is considered a typical disease with medically unexplained symptoms (MUS), which refers to a condition where symptoms suggest the presence of a physical disease whose cause cannot be found by examination. Although previous studies of ME/CFS have focused on specific events, such as diagnosis, and the psychological changes that accompany them, the chronological events experienced by patients and the transformation of the problems they face have not been adequately grasped.

This paper analyzes ME/CFS patients’ illness behavior through interviews and explores the difficulties patients face at each stage of illness behavior. In ME/CFS patients’ narratives, their illness behavior shows complexities of going back and forth between stages, rather than progressing step by step like an acute illness.

The seemingly excessive treatment behavior called “doctor shopping” is actually linked to doctors’ ignorance, suspicion, and incomprehension of diseases without a biomarker, rather than the desire of the patient to dispel an “inappropriate” label of laziness and mental illness. Indeed, it would be more accurate to say that interviewees were not accepted by several hospitals. In addition, since patients are often suspected of not being really ill even after diagnosis, they cannot experience the dependent-patient role.

Therefore, by becoming an “active patient” by themselves, ME/CFS patients must undertake the “independent-patient role” to secure necessary treatment and welfare services. It should be noted that these patient behaviors are not undertaken for secondary gain but are due to their having no other way to receive necessary care.

NB Full paper not available

Posted in News | Tagged , | Comments Off on Difficulties of living with an illness not considered a “Disease”: focusing on the illness behavior of ME/CFS patients

Save4Children – helping children with ME in psychiatric wards

Save4Children – helping children with ME in psychiatric wards

 

The charity Save4Children has been created by the editors of the ME Global Chronicle and helps parents whose children have been forced into psychiatric wards by authorities, to try and set them free by legal procedures.

In recent years, the Save4Children fund has directed its attention and help at the Danish ME patient Karina Hansen.

Karina had been forcibly accepted into the Neurocenter in Hammel, Jutland. On Monday November 17th, 2017, she returned back home, never to return to the clinic at which she had been staying – a clinic for patients with brain conditions.

The primary obstacle on the road to fully getting her personal freedom back was her state-appointed guardian, who had been sort-of cooperating during the duration of her forced stay at the Hammel Neurocenter.

On October 10th 2018, a judge deemed Karina to have legal capacity to make decisions about her own life, and revoked guardianship over her, with her guardian’s permission.

The Save4Children fund has been able to contribute a small amount towards undoing the  high costs this event has brought with it.

Report new cases:

Now is the time to spend this fund’s donations on one or multiple new cases. They’re still at a stage of deliberation, but if you’re familiar with any cases where young ME patients are being forced to stay at psychiatric institutions or are about to, make sure to tell them via email info@let-me.be  .

The fund is intended for parents who can’t afford to dispute such a process, who can prove their lack of sufficient funds.

New way of donating:

GBP bank details:

Account Holder: Save4Children
Account number: 70983145
UK Sort Code: 23-14-70

Address:

TransferWise
56 Shoreditch High Street
London
E1 6JJ
United Kingdom

Posted in News | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Save4Children – helping children with ME in psychiatric wards

New ME/CFS training module for doctors & medical students

New CPD: Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, May 13, 2020

 

A new training module for doctors and medical students has been developed by the CMRC Medical Education Group led by Dr Nina Muirhead, and leads to the award of 1 CPD (Continuing Professional Development) point.

It has been published on the StudyPRN website, run by Lerna Ltd, a medical education company which operates in partnership with the University of South Wales.

Dr Muirhead explains:

Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) is a common and severe complex multisystem disease with many sufferers waiting years for a diagnosis. The narrative and education to date has neither aligned with the patient experience of this illness, nor communicated the emerging biomedical evidence.

Following the coronavirus pandemic thousands of people will know how severe and debilitating the symptoms of fatigue can be. Millions will understand the experience of being housebound, but for most these experiences will have lasted days, weeks or months.

Imagine feeling viral, exhausted, unwell and in pain, confined to your bed or house, lying in a dark room for years or even decades. The world has been shocked by the damage that viruses can do, and soon we will need to examine the consequences of chronic post-viral illness including ME/CFS.

In writing this module I have started from scratch. I have drawn on the international peer reviewed literature and emerging international ME/CFS educational resources and have been fortunate to receive significant contributions from medical experts, scientists and patients.

I am humbled by the contributions of those who are severely ill and the effort and energy they have devoted to this collaboration. I recommend that you read the four pre-course peer reviewed papers before embarking on the learning module. It would be of great help if you could take a minute to click through the anonymous pre-and post-course questionnaire so that more accurate information can be gathered to help develop and update future ME/CFS learning materials.

This module is just the start. There will be some who take time picking through the evidence and I welcome your opinion and future collaboration. For others it may be an extra CPD point. For the patients who are recognised, believed and diagnosed because you have taken the time to do this learning module – it could be life changing.

Contributing post written by Nina Muirhead BA(oxon) BMBCh(oxon) MRCS DOHNS MEd PGDipDerm. Nina is also associated with or alumni of:

Oxford University
Open University
Cardiff University
Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust
Royal College of Surgeons
Royal College of Physicians

This resource is completely FREE and tackles the myths surrounding the disease, while assessing your current knowledge and educating you further:  https://www.studyprn.com/p/chronic-fatigue-syndrome

Posted in News | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on New ME/CFS training module for doctors & medical students