Could one gene help explain ME/CFS, FM, POTS, IBS, EDS, IBS and others?

ME/CFS, FM, POTS, IBS, EDS and others often exist in a kind of swarm of interconnected illnesses. All have been maligned at one time or another because of the wide range of symptoms they produce. How could a biological disease cause so many different symptoms?

After this week, perhaps a better question is how could one gene cause them. Check out an astonishing study that pinpointed a gene that may wreak havoc in some people in all these disorders. For those people, help – perhaps even a cure – might not be that far off.

Health rising blog post, by Cort Johnson, 22 October 2016: One gene many disorders: enetic finding could help explain POTS, EDS, IBS, FM, ME/CFS and others.

First, at least for me, there was chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) and fibromyalgia (FM). Then I learned about irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), then POTS and in the last five years Ehler’s-Danlos (EDS) and Mast Cell Activation Syndrome (MCAS).

The more researchers looked the more they seemed to uncover a large group of syndromes which tended to flock together. Anyone who has ME/CFS or FM now has to consider whether they also might have dysautonomia, IBS, POTS, MCAS and a host of other disorders (interstitial cystitis, migraine, multiple chemical sensitivities, small fiber neuropathy).

Obviously, this suite of disorders is connected somehow, but the question – what is the tie that binds? – has remained. The wide range of symptoms – from flushing to gut problems to chronic pain to orthostatic intolerance to connective tissue problems – had defied understanding – and helped psychologists to get their feet in the door.

Now the NIH of all groups – never really a friend to any of these – may have uncovered a link – that may explain them for some people.

Family Study

Elevated basal serum tryptase identifies a multisystem disorder associated with increased TPSAB1 copy number. © 2016 Nature America, Inc. All rights reserved.

The researchers did what a Simmaron Research Foundation study is currently doing with ME/CFS; they zeroed on a set of families with these problems and studied them intensively. First, increased levels of an immune factor called tryptase which is sometimes associated with mast cell activation showed up. Researchers did not find signs of altered mast cell growth or morphology or increased IgE degranulation or tryptase expression; i.e., they said they found no indication of mastocytosis or mast cell activation disease (MCAS). Despite the high tryptase levels they believed the disease they uncovered was more akin to connective tissue disorders such as Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (EDS) than MCAS.

Mast cells have often been implicated in certain functional disorders; however, our patients did not have evidence of clonal mast cell disease or evidence of mast cell activation, whereas many did have connective tissue manifestations overlapping with those seen in EDS III. The authors

Of the 96 people from 35 family’s studies, almost 50% met the criteria for IBS, 65% met the criteria for chronic gastroesophageal reflux, 28% had joint hypermobility, 48% had arthritis, 47% had headache, or body pain, a full quarter had congenital skeletal problems, 46% had autonomic issues and 34% had POTS. Other common issues included flushing and pruritus (51%), itching and sleep disruption (39%) and exaggerated reactions to venom.

Fatigue wasn’t measured but since fatigue is common in all these disorders, it was likely quite high. (Many of these individuals probably would have met the criteria for fibromyalgia or chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS).)

Extra Sequences Spell Trouble

The group’s genetic secrets were not yielded easily. First exome and genome sequencing found no common gene variants but a linkage analysis identified a single “peak” on one chromosome – a section of the chromosome containing the 4 genes responsible for producing tryptase.

Further testing found that individuals containing multiple copies of a tryptase encoding sequence were highly, highly, (highly) likely (p<.000001) to have high tryptase levels. This is the kind of probability that’s probably considered a slam dunk in genetics; everyone who carried multiple copies of this tryptase-producing sequence had high tryptase levels and a wide range of sometimes bizarre symptoms. Plus, the more copies of the copies of the sequence an individual had, the worse they were off symptomatically. None of the family members without these sequences had any symptoms.

Tryptase is the most common enzyme found in mast cells and is often used as a marker for mast cell activation. Interestingly, none of the individuals had evidence of mast cell activation syndrome. If tryptase was causing their symptoms, it was doing so in a different way than is ordinarily associated with MCAS. (MCAS is apparently called a syndrome for a reason.).

After identifying a genetic anomaly associated with high tryptase levels in families it was time to see if it showed up in other groups. A retrospective analysis of people who’d had genomic analyses done for other disorders indicated that all the individuals with increased serum tryptase levels had multiple copies of the tryptase encoding sequence.

Next, the researchers turned to a healthy control group, and again found that all the individuals with increased tryptase levels had multiple copies of the tryptase encoding gene. (Three of the “healthy controls” turned out to have similar symptoms as the original cohort; the rest were either normal or had minor problems).

New Disease

It’s rare that genetic effects are so clear. In fact, the genetic effects were so clear that the condition is now called hereditary-a tryptasemia. This disease is “exclusively caused” by increased copy numbers of the tryptase-producing sequence.

Exactly how elevated tryptase levels are causing pain and autonomic nervous symptoms is not clear but may involve “protease-activated 2 receptor pathways” (if that’s any help (lol). The study highlights, though, that it’s not necessary to understand a disease to find a treatment for it. Knowing that elevated tryptase levels cause pain, connective tissue problems and orthostatic intolerance, even if we don’t know how, can allow researchers to develop anti-tryptase blockers that could conceivably stop these symptoms in their tracks.

Tryptase can be tested for, and in fact, around five percent of the population, or over 15 million people in the U.S. have high tryptase levels. Most of them are probably asymptomatic but those who are ill could benefit greatly from this finding. It’s very rare to find such a clear genetic link and such a clear treatment pathway.

NIH Admits It Was Not All in Their Head After All

The NIH itself noted that this study should give hope to people with complex multi-system disorders who, too often, have ended up being told their unusual symptoms must be “all in their head”. It was obviously high on this work. It’s not often that a clear cause of an illness – let alone a spectrum of illnesses – may have been found. In fact, the NIH was so excited that it produced a video about the finding, and sent out a press release featuring none

Chronic fatigue syndrome’s relationship with NIAID and Fauci is a complex one; NIAID is the only Institute to ever fund ME/CFS research centers, but its abandonment of ME/CFS in the early 2000’s ushered in 15 years of declining funding. That obviously didn’t endear anyone to Fauci or NIAID, but now NIAID and NINDS do appear to be doing the lion’s share of the work in the ME/CFS Working Group at the NIH.

Plus, seeing NIAID crow over its genetic finding for a complex multi-symptom condition is a good thing. One of the reasons NIAID abandoned ME/CFS was because it was a complex multi-symptom, multi-systemic condition. The multiple system issue gave NIAID an out; because ME/CFS clearly wasn’t simply an immune disease it decided it was no longer responsible for it. Fifteen years later, ironically, as NIAID begins to welcome ME/CFS back, it has found an immune factor that causes multiple symptoms and produces a multiple system disease.

Next up for this group: developing a diagnostic test to detect alpha tryptase gene copies and finding ways to block tryptase production. For people with extra copies of this gene and who are ill the news is good indeed. Few diseases, after all, can be traced to one factor. Pharmaceutical companies are surely combing their drug databases for drugs with tryptase-inhibiting pathways.

Thanks to The SolveME/CFS Initiative for highlighting this study on their website. Without their doing that, I would have missed it entirely.

Posted in News | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Could one gene help explain ME/CFS, FM, POTS, IBS, EDS, IBS and others?

Severe ME in Australia: suffering ignored and denied help

ME Australia blog post, by Sasha Nimmo, 13 September 2016: Severe ME: Suffering ignored and denied help

Myalgic Encephalomyelitis is estimated to affect between 0.4% and 1% of the population, according to the International Consensus Criteria primer for medical practitioners, endorsed by Australian patient organisations. In Australia, that is between 96,700 and 241,800 people (ABS population figures). Of those, 25% are so severely affected that they cannot leave their homes or even their bed.

Between 24,000 – 60,000 Australians have severe ME.

Speaking to patients around Australia, a major hurdle is simply finding a GP who can visit them at home for basic medical care.

“The most difficult thing for me when I was completely bedbound was having no medical professional who could come and see me as I was too ill to travel to the doctor. Advocating for myself to receive basic medical care was exhausting and stressful and very taxing on my health,” patient in Victoria.

“What frustrates me most is how many doctors just do not understand how much we deteriorate after each visit, even if they say they understand severe ME. If they did they would do home visits,” patient in South Australia.

“My GP said he’d be able to visit me at home as he could see I was deteriorating and getting to his practice was difficult. But when I rang to book a home appointment, he wouldn’t see me at home and I was left without any medical care and without any help from the practice to find a new GP.”

“The pain medication I was on ran out, leaving me in severe pain and unable to walk the couple of steps to the kitchen to get food and water,” patient in the ACT.

“I cannot see a doctor at the time I’m having symptoms because I’m too unwell to get out of the bed and get ready for the appointment. Of course, I’m looked at with suspicious eyes when my symptoms ease and I can get in for an appointment.

“I don’t have medical degree or training so that I can explain my suffering the way they can get it…” patient in Queensland.

All of these patients would only speak on the condition of anonymity.

“I wish to remain anonymous as I don’t want to be mistreated by healthcare practices and/or government agencies for advocating for ME anymore,” patient in Queensland.

For those who can find doctors, finding ones who understand the impact is hard.

“Educating doctors about ME, and particularly severe ME is crucial to patients being able to access appropriate care, which is sensitive to the unique disabilities severe ME brings,” patient in Victoria.

“Canberra is the national capital but there are no specialists who know about ME here,” patient in the ACT.

“If the hospital and Disability SA had accepted how much I needed an electric wheelchair ages ago when I tried to apply repeatedly, both through hospital OT and Disability advocate from MALSSA, then I would not have deteriorated so far. Sad really, probably common everywhere. People overseas I think have the impression Australia, especially Adelaide, has all these researchers. That doesn’t matter if none understand severe ME and can visit,” patient in South Australia.

“I’m scared, to be honest,  as no one really seems to understand just how really dangerous severe ME is,” South Australian patient.

“All specialists I have been referred to (psychiatrists, cardiologists, neurologists, rheumatologists) either had the wrong idea or had no idea about ME nor CFS and they are supposed to deliver the best care for the patients,” South Australian patient.

“Sadly, the NCNED Clinic has closed its doors due to overwhelming demand. We need funds to train more clinicians and establish facilities, hopefully one in each state/territory.

“Very rare GP specialists are very expensive, too far to travel, and possibly their diagnosis and treatment protocol are not the same,” Queensland patient.

What is needed: education, in-home support and policies for hospitalisation

“We need Centre for Excellence in ME in Australia, where medical and healthcare service providers can rely on facts and case studies about ME. I hope NCNED will take up on this role.” Queensland patient.

Patients say they need:

  • Standardised, up-to-date diagnostic criteria
  • Safe and effective treatment/management guide
  • Designated ME specialists in Australia
  • In home care for cooking, cleaning, community care of patients with staff who are educated in ME sensitivities e.g. noise, light, chemical sensitivities (some patients  have been denied services as they asked for no perfumes/deodorants and the care service refused to comply under ‘occupational health and safety policies’
  • Nursing assistance for administering medications/bathing etc.
  • Regular in-home treatments which are affordable e.g. saline infusions for POTS
  • Case management services to coordinate all of the severe patients’ needs so they (or their carers) don’t have to organise all of this when they are cognitively compromised
  • 24 hour care for the most severe patients
  • Respite care for carers of severe patients
  • Hospitalisations where patients are located in suitable rooms, for example on the infectious disease wards where they are away from other patients, noise, light and the risk of infection is kept low
  • In-hospital care for severe patients that does not involve contempt from treating doctors and numerous visits from psychiatrists
  • Provide the right and critical information about severe ME for DSP/NDIS approval
  • Financial support for mobility aids (items such as slings for beds, railing, noise cancelling headphones, heated rugs, cooling vests, mattresses designed for bedbound people to prevent pain/bedsores, walkers, reclining electric wheelchairs) climate control at home, noise control at home and for off label prescriptions, which are still very expensive for people with financial challenges, which most severe ME patients have.
  • Attitudes impacting health
  • Misinformation and ignorance about severe ME make it much more difficult to access healthcare, services, insurance payments and daily living support.

“Having to negotiate my way through application for disability payments and also then temporary and permanent disability insurance applications was horrendous and impacted my health,” Victorian patient.

“From the treatment I received and experienced, severe ME doesn’t exist in Australia. They have no idea about our suffering and many are seriously and dangerously confused it with depression or other mental illnesses. And they don’t listen to me when I explain. They deny my experience and suffering as if I was making things up. But, I think this is the general attitude towards chronic illnesses in society; if you don’t get better, die quietly.”

Outdated, harmful government guidelines

Nationally, in the 1990s, the federal government commissioned guidelines. In 2002 the Australian chronic fatigue syndrome clinical guidelines were published and adopted by the the National Health and Medical Research Council. They were heavily criticised for having a bias towards the psychological, dismissing biological evidence and omitting severely affected patients.

At the moment, Australia has no official government clinical guidelines as they ‘expire’ after 10 years and the government has not replaced them.

I asked state government health ministers questions about caring for people with severe ME. WA and Tasmania were the only states to respond. Their answers show they are using potentially harmful treatments and have no clinical criteria for diagnosis. Instead, they consult papers which refer to ‘contested illnesses’, despite the fact that Myalgic Encephalomyelitis has been recognised by the World Health Organisation since 1969. The guidelines on the WA health website recommend psychological treatments for children, which have no basis in science.

Read more about care for people with ME in regions of Australia

 

Posted in News | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Severe ME in Australia: suffering ignored and denied help

Welsh Ambulance Trust booklet & app to aid communicating health needs

In 2013 The Welsh Ambulance Trust developed a bilingual Pre Hospital Communication Guide in the form of a small booklet.

They have now developed an App version of the guide, which is available for everyone to use, you can download it to your phone for free!

pre-_hospital_communication_guide_coverThe App is a tool to help para medics and other healthcare staff to communicate with those who have additional communication needs including:

  • People who are Deaf or hard of hearing
  • People for whom English is not their first language
  • People with learning disabilities
  • People whose illness or injury affects their communication

A person may use a mixture of speech, gesture and pictures to communicate. The App uses images and a small amount of text to help you find out important information about someone or what has happened if they have had an accident.

The App can be used to identify if the person uses a specific communication method or the language they speak. Anyone can download and use the App for free! Its available on iOS, Android and Blackberry.

  • iOS – search for ‘PreHospApp’
  • Blackberry – search for ‘pre hospital app’
  • Android – search for ‘Pre-Hospital Communication App’
Posted in News | Tagged , | Comments Off on Welsh Ambulance Trust booklet & app to aid communicating health needs

Dr Bested’s experience of treating gut symptoms in ME/CFS

Altered Gut Microbiome in ME/CFS, by Alison C Bested, October 2016

In 2007 as a doctor specialized in treating patients with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (ME)/
Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS), I was curious to see if there was a relationship of the patients’ irritable bowel symptoms and their degree of fatigue and pain. Clinically I had noticed that when parasites were found in a patient’s stool and treated, that afterwards, often in addition their fatigue going up a notch, sometimes their headache pain and general pain symptoms improved. I was intrigued.

Dr. Alan Logan was able to secure private funding to look at a small group of my patients with ME/CFS and irritable bowel symptoms. We had 20 patients as controls and 20 patients that we treated with billions of probiotic bacteria: Lactobacillus casei strain Shirota for two months. We were hoping to see improvements in fatigue and pain in the
patients.

There was a rise in Lactobacillus levels as expected with the supplementation given to the patients. We were surprised to see an increase in the Bifidobacterium levels. We do not
see improvement in their fatigue or pain levels. With experience, looking back, a two month protocol for supplementation with a probiotic was far too short a time.

What did surprise us was that the patients who were treated with a probiotic had significant improvement in their anxiety scores. It was possible that the decreased anxiety was a direct result of improved bowel function. We postulated that perhaps this was an example of enteric neuroscience with the bowel communicating directly with the brain through the vagal nerve.

Perhaps, we wondered, if by changing the microbiota in the bowel, it helped to restore normal intestinal health, decrease intestinal permeability, reduce inflammation and cytokines and indirectly reduce anxiety. We knew that there was lots of room for further studies in this area.

A Venket Rao, Alison Bested, Tracey Beaulne, Martin Katzman, Christina Lorio, John Berardi,  Alan Logan. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study of a probiotic in  emotional symptoms of chronic fatigue syndrome. Gut Pathogens, 2009, 1:6.     DOI: 10.1186/1757-4749-1-6

I was thrilled with this new article about gastrointestinal disturbances or irritable bowel
syndrome and altered microbiota in patients with ME/CFS. Gastrointestinal disturbances are present in many patients with ME/CFS. According to the article by Giloteaux et al. dysbiosis or altered gut microbiome (types and numbers of bacteria present in the gut) is present in patients with ME/CFS. Dysbiosis of the gut microflora may contribute to ongoing symptoms of inflammation in patients with ME/CFS.

Potentially, in the future, this could lead to better investigation and treatment for symptoms of dysbiosis or IBS in patients with ME/CFS.

Ludovic Giloteaux, Julia K. Goodrich, William A. Walters, Susan M. Levine, Ruth E. Ley and Maureen R. Hanson. Reduced diversity and altered composition of the gut microbiome in individuals with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome. Microbiome (2016) 4:30 DOI 10.1186/s40168-016-0171-4

Alison C. Bested MD FRCPC
Hematological Pathologist
Clinical Associate Professor
Faculty of Medicine
University of British Columbia

Posted in News | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Dr Bested’s experience of treating gut symptoms in ME/CFS

NICE takes a dim view of foreign work on ME/CFS

ME Association news blog post, 24 October 2016: NICE takes a dim view of foreign work on ME/CFS – Robin Ellis Freedom of Information request

The main supplier of England’s drugs and treatment guidelines, the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE), tends not to take foreign research into account when it produces work on ME/CFS.

In internal correspondence released this month under the Freedom of Information Act (FoI), the agency admitted that it has not yet considered the results of important US studies when deciding what is best for British M.E. patients.

NICE are holding back the review of their guidelines on ME/CFS until some time in 2017, saying the evidence to justify earlier reconsideration isn’t strong enough.

“It is not really for the NHS to respond to a report commissioned in another country and not yet examined by its commissioner”, the agency’s director for clinical practice wrote to colleagues as they were assembling their reply to a FoI request from Robin Ellis.

Professor Mark Baker wrote: “We would take seriously the views of the relevant esteemed medical associations in the UK, principally the RCP (Royal College of Physicians) and the RCPsych,(Royal College of Psychiatrists) when looking at reviewing this guidance.

“I am not aware of any reason to do anything before then unless some major new evidence on treatment emerges, and we know that no major studies are in progress”.

The applicant, Mr Ellis, filed three FoI requests earlier this year seeking the release of information held by NICE about the PACE Trial.

This time he wanted to know if NICE allowed its thinking on M.E. to be influenced by overseas research using easily observable symptoms – like testing for post-exertional fatigue using the 48-hour exercise test – the 2015 US Institute of Medicine report on the “devastating severity” of M.E – and the National Institutes of Health report which “retired” the Oxford criteria for CFS believing it to be harmful to people with the illness.

Mr Ellis also pointed to another US agency that had recently determined that CBT and GET were ineffective treatments given the poor outcomes reported all round – including in the PACE Trial.

Mr Ellis’s latest FoI request was formally entitled: Unique characteristics of pw ME/CFS as defined by the CCC and ICC and exercise physiologist experts eg Workwell Foundation, Snell, VanNess, Stevens, Klimas. He wanted to see what papers were held by NICE on these matters.

In the papers released by NICE, there is an intervention from the Countess of Mar, who chairs the Forward ME Group of charities.

The Countess wrote to NICE:

“I have to assume that you must agree that patients with ME/CFS are very much the same wherever they are in the world, and that there will be no difference between UK and US patients.

“I also assume that you must agree that very many more resources have been applied to this issue in the US than in the UK. Professor Baker reiterated his belief that there is no evidence that GET makes some patients worse.

“Absence of evidence is no evidence of absence, and there is plenty of evidence from the two major charities in the UK – Action for ME and the ME Association – which have both done major surveys of their members…”

Professor Baker replied that NICE will conduct a critique of the American work to consider “whether it adds anything to what we already know”.

He added: “You will be aware that the British academic establishment holds an entirely different view, though not necessarily any better informed.”

On October 19, Mr Ellis formally requested an internal review of NICE’s handling of his FoI request. “I asked for information around the decision NOT to update the NICE Guidelines, none was provided.”

The full exchange of correspondence can be read here: www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/unique_characeristics_of_pw_mecf#incoming-883778

The papers released can be read here:
www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/357691/response/883778/attach/2/FOI%20EH73066%20Redacted%20documents%20for%20release.pdf

The papers have been slightly redacted by NICE. The agency wrote that it did not want to show details of junior staff involved in the correspondence nor a third party who was consulted as part of the exercise.

Posted in News | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on NICE takes a dim view of foreign work on ME/CFS

The ‘extreme’ side-effects of antidepressants

BBC news article, By Lesley Ashmall (BBC Victoria Derbyshire programme), 19 October 2016: The ‘extreme’ side-effects of antidepressants

Claire Hanley says she tried to take her own life twice after taking antidepressants
People who say their lives have been ruined by commonly prescribed antidepressants, known as SSRIs, are taking their case to Parliament on Wednesday. Some users say the tablets have made them suicidal.

“I was getting seizure-like symptoms, where my muscles were jolting around of their own accord,” Claire Hanley tells the BBC’s Victoria Derbyshire programme, explaining the effects she says antidepressants had on her body.

She had begun taking them while caring for her seriously ill mother and studying for her final exams at Cambridge University, but suffered severe side-effects after her GP prescribed a stronger dose of tablet.

“Within two weeks I’d tried to take my own life twice,” she says.

“I felt disorientated and sick and had digestive problems and infections, it was really extreme. I don’t even know how to begin. All I can remember is being on the bedroom floor in a kind of semi-conscious state having seizure after massive seizure.”

It has been 20 years since she first took the tablets, but Ms Hanley says she still suffers from the consequences of a cocktail of drugs doctors have prescribed to try to treat the side-effects of the original antidepressants.

She says she has constant muscle ache and fatigue, and spends most days in bed.

It is thought about one in 100 people experiences severe side-effects as a result of taking SSRIs.

The drugs are designed to increase serotonin levels in the brain, which can improve symptoms of depression.

Some experts, however, now believe many more people than was previously thought are suffering negative consequences.

Prof David Healy, from the psychiatric unit at Bangor University, believes the drugs make “one in four people become more anxious, rather than less”.

“Some people become very agitated and some go on from that to become suicidal,” he says.

“The drugs can become the problem that they’re then used to treat.”

The drugs companies have declined to comment, but Dr Sarah Jarvis, a GP in West London, is keen to point out that doctors do not prescribe antidepressants lightly.

She also stresses the vital role they can play in helping people with depression – saying, if untreated, “moderate depression and severe depression wreck lives, and very regularly cost lives”.

Dr Jarvis adds that for most people, the drugs are effective.

“I think for people with severe depression, they may need to try two or three [different types of antidepressant] before they find one that does work for them, but for most people we can find a medicine which will help them and for whom the benefits will outweigh the risks,” she says.

Antidepressants

  • Antidepressants cost the NHS £780,000 per day
  • Between 2005 and 2012, there was a 54% increase in the number of children prescribed antidepressants in the UK
  • Common side-effects include dizziness, headaches and feeling sick. These generally improve with time
  • Antidepressants can cause serotonin syndrome, which – while uncommon – can lead to seizures, an irregular heartbeat and unconsciousness in the most severe cases
  • In rare instances, some people experience suicidal thoughts and a desire to self-harm when they first take antidepressants. People under the age of 25 seem particularly at risk

Sources: Health and Social Care Information Centre, World Health Organization, NHS Choices

But according to some experts, such as Prof David Healy, the side-effects of antidepressants are not just felt when someone is taking them, but also when they try to reduce the dose or come off the tablets altogether.

“There’s a large number of people – and it seems to be more women than men – who have great difficulties trying to reduce the dose,” he says.

“And if they halt the treatment, they can become terribly agitated, they can become suicidal.”

“When you look at the clinical trials that have been done, the taper phase – the point where the person is trying to come off the drug – is the riskiest period.

“That’s the point where the person is most likely to commit suicide, or the most likely to do terrible things.”

Gemma – not her real name – says her withdrawal symptoms were so bad that she is now back on the tablets.

“I was told I could come off [antidepressants] no problem,” she says.

“But I was in a mess basically. I reached a point where I could barely function. I was incredibly anxious – I was highly anxious all the time, so I was very panicky, very agitated. I could barely sleep.”

Gemma had followed medical advice and come off the tablets slowly, but she suffered severe consequences nevertheless.

She says: “I was petrified. I was crying my eyes out. I didn’t know what on Earth was happening to me. I guessed it could be the medication, but I thought I had some kind of terminal illness. I just didn’t know what was happening.”

Gemma eventually decided to go back on the drugs, and the withdrawal symptoms quickly disappeared.

“I was shocked. All the migraines, the muscle aches – everything – just stopped instantly,” she says.

Many people find the effects manageable, but others – some of whom got in contact with us – say they have been severely affected. Here are a few.

Brigitte, from Exeter, said: “I couldn’t walk and was experiencing the most horrendous sensory sensations. My muscles were burning, I had facial twitches, terrible night sweats and numbness on my forehead.”

Pauline, from Hertfordshire, said: “I look and feel like a drug addict, I can’t focus my eyes. My eyes are like slits even if I’ve not been crying. I cannot sleep at all, and because it seems my body realises it is not getting the drug, every day is living hell.”

Christine said: “The fatigue is so bad that I have to go to bed in the afternoons and can do very little. I feel dizzy, nauseous, have blurred vision and a headache at the back of my head and on top.”

But others believe people who need medication should not be put off by those who have experienced severe symptoms.

Mehran, from south-east London, said: “I have been on and off antidepressants for over a decade. It is only natural to have withdrawal effects as the brain becomes comfortable with a certain level of chemicals. Usually, those people, like myself, who withdrew abruptly actually still needed the medication. I worry [that the stories of those with severe symptoms] put fear into the people that need medication.”

Mark, from London, said: “[When I started taking antidepressants] I did feel more, rather than less, anxious for the first two to three weeks – which was accompanied by muscle twitches, nausea and a general feeling of dissociation. But then I felt fine, I could function again and I got better. I believe SSRIs provided a crutch to support me through a difficult time, while I worked on finding a longer-term solution using psychotherapy.” Mark does not recall experiencing any withdrawal symptoms.

For Dr Jarvis, however, while some individuals may suffer prolonged side-effects from antidepressants – lasting months or, on occasion, years – she would be surprised if all of the reported effects related to the tablets.

“What we need to bear in mind is that some patients who have taken these have been very vulnerable, they’ve been very anxious and it can be very difficult to tell what is anxiety and what is the tablets,” she says.

But for Ms Hanley, the dangers must be taken more seriously by medical professionals.

“It may be a minority of people who have these extreme reactions, but they exist,” she says.

“If you look at the leaflets in the packets, and it says one in 100 will have this symptom, they’ve got to realise that that one person could be their patient. It does happen.”

NB In the ME Association survey of patients symptoms in 2010:

  • 46% found depression a major problem
  • 40% found depression a minor problem

Many were taking anti depressants.

Posted in News | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on The ‘extreme’ side-effects of antidepressants

Nose & throat inflammation & HPV vaccinations in ME

ME Research UK article, 19 October 2016: Nose and throat inflammation

There are many different triggers for ME/CFS. In most people, the illness starts with an infection, often viral, but others report a vaccination or immunisation as the initial event. Although there has been very little research on this particular aspect, one Belgian report from 2002 found a small cluster of cases (around 5% of more than 1500 patients) where hepatitis B vaccination could have been involved in the initiation of ME/CFS  (read abstract), and there have been reports of ‘CFS-related’ adverse events after flu vaccinations  (read abstract).

Recently, there have been suggestions that vaccination against human papillomavirus (HPV) can lead to “patterned illness” involving chronic pain, headaches, fatigue, and problems on standing – very like the symptoms suffered by people with ME/CFS (read more). While HPV vaccination is considered beneficial overall, and there is little evidence of serious adverse effects in most recipients, the European Medicines Agency announced the launch of a ‘safety review’ of HPV vaccines in 2015 that will hopefully encourage healthcare professionals to look for unusual but potentially serious adverse effects (read more).

A Japanese study published this month in Immunological Research reports a possible association between HPV vaccination, chronic epipharyngitis (inflammation of the back of the nose and throat), and chronic symptoms. The researchers from the Hotta Osamu Clinic in Miyagi, Japan examined the nasopharynx in 41 young women (average age 17.3 years) who had developed ME/CFS-like symptoms following HPV vaccination.

Their symptoms included headache (in 97.6 %), general fatigue (95.1 %), sleep disturbance (87.8 %), stiffness of neck and upper back (85.3 %), photophobia (80.5 %), muscle weakness (75.6 %), and cognitive impairment (68.3 %). As a result, most of them (83%) were unable to attend school. They had been been treated using a number of approaches, but their condition had not significantly improved with any of these.

On closer examination, almost half of the patients had mild pharyngeal symptoms, but abrasion of the epipharyngeal mucous membrane with a cotton swab (which, the researchers say, tests for inflammation as chronic epipharyngitis is often not obvious by eye) and smear analysis showed that all 41 of them had severe epipharyngitis, identified by severe bleeding during the examination.

Sixteen patients were willing to come into hospital for treatment, consisting of a very dilute zinc chloride solution thoroughly applied to the epipharyngeal wall. While this treatment reduces the pain and inflammation at the back of the nose and throat, the most interesting finding was that in 13/16 patients there was also a marked reduction in symptoms overall after the procedure, with 4 patients eventually achieving a ‘cure’. As the authors say, “Given the degree of impairment of quality of life previously observed in these patients, the degree of response to this treatment was quite remarkable….” They point out that the extremely high incidence of severe epipharyngitis (100%) and dramatic improvement in patients’ general and multisystem symptoms after treatment strongly suggest an association between chronic epipharyngitis and the ME/CFS-like symptoms that developed after HPV vaccination.

Interestingly, the Japanese researchers outlined their results at a conference earlier this year, at the 4th International Symposium on Vaccines in Leipzig Germany (see the video presentation). In it, they point out that chronic epipharyngitis may have an important role in the development of various autoimmune diseases and disorders. They say that the epipharynx has high levels of immunologic activation and that, because of its anatomic location, chronic inflammation in the epipharynx can have systemic effects via autoimmunity and the autonomic nervous system.

It’s important to remember, however, that ‘chronic epipharyngitis’ is poorly recognised, and that the term is rarely used in the modern medical literature, particularly outside of Japan. For that reason, other studies need to validate and confirm these findings – in people with other medical conditions (autoimmune diseases and autonomic nervous disorders) as well as ME/CFS patients – and extend them to determine, for instance, the prevalence of chronic epipharyngitis in the population at large.

Are these results relevant to the majority of ME/CFS patients whose illness began with other triggers, mainly viral or other infections? Well, an accompanying Editorial in Immunological Research suggests so. Certainly, ‘sore throat’ at the early stages of illness had a prominent part  in descriptions of epidemics of myalgic encephalitis (read more), and the symptom is part of some definitions of ME/CFS, such as the Holmes criteria, and the International Consensus Criteria of 2011 as part of the ‘flu-like symptoms’ that may be recurrent (read more). A study examining the nasopharynx mucosa in a mixed-onset group of ME/CFS patients would well be revealing; if frank inflammation is present, a treatment trial could explore whether improvements occur in chronic symptoms as well as local inflammation.

Posted in News | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Nose & throat inflammation & HPV vaccinations in ME

Perceptions of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis

Miscellanea blog post by Robert McMullen, September 2016: “Perceptions of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis

A person with ME looks back at his experiences and at some prejudices that exist about people with ME in society and the medical profession.

Excerpt:

Before I was ill, I knew very little about ME. I was aware of the scepticism that surrounded it, which, combined with my ignorance, made me fairly cynical about those who “claimed” to have it. It had never occurred to me then that there might be people for whom this diagnosis – given to them – was unwelcome, despised or even denied.

When I was first unwell, before I was diagnosed, I detected no hostility or scepticism towards me. Mostly the doctors seemed sympathetic, concerned and curious to understand what was causing my symptoms. But once I was diagnosed and presented as a patient who had been diagnosed with ME I felt as though I was treated quite differently; as though I was someone I was not. Symptoms and character traits would be attributed to me that I have never had. I read articles by doctors who had never met me, denouncing me by association, as though I had diagnosed myself in order to join some sort of deluded cult of malingering hypochondriacs.

I couldn’t believe that any signatory to the Hippocratic Oath could be so cruel or ignorant to write with such venom without very good reason. My inclination was therefore to believe that I must be different to most other people who were diagnosed with ME, and that they, not the doctors, were the cause of the hostility I encountered.

For years I desperately sought an alternative diagnosis but none was offered. A neurologist once told me to have nothing to do with any of the ME organisations because most people who say they have ME are “just depressed”. But he assured me that I had an “organic illness” and that he would “get to the bottom of it”. His words were comforting to me at the time but the succour was short lived. The only alternative diagnosis he offered was that I had some sort of post-viral syndrome, which was even less useful than being told I that I had ME. In being discharged from his care, I was given the confident assurance that I would get better. Twenty two years later I am still waiting. And if he has not retired, he may well still be offering the same confident assurances to patients like me, oblivious to the outcomes of those he discharges.

Read more

Posted in News | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Perceptions of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis

Privacy on long term condition health discussion forums

Research abstract:

Background:
The ethics of research into online communities is a long-debated issue, with many researchers arguing that open-access discussion groups are publically accessible data and do not require informed consent from participants for their use for research purposes. However, it has been suggested that there is a discrepancy between the perceived and actual privacy of user-generated online content by community members.

Objective:
There has been very little research regarding how privacy is experienced and enacted online. The objective of this study is to address this gap by qualitatively exploring the expectations of privacy on Internet forums among individuals with long-term conditions.

Methods:
Semistructured interviews were conducted with 20 participants with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) and 21 participants with type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus, and were analyzed using thematic analysis. Participants were recruited via online and offline routes, namely forums, email lists, newsletters, and
face-to-face support groups.

Results:
The findings indicate that privacy online is a nebulous concept. Rather than individuals drawing a clear-cut distinction between what they would and would not be comfortable sharing online, it was evident that these situations were contextually dependent and related to a number of unique and individual factors.

Conclusions:
Interviewees were seen to carefully manage how they presented themselves on forums, filtering and selecting the information that they shared about themselves in order to develop and maintain a particular online persona, while maintaining and preserving an acceptable level of privacy.

‘I Always Vet Things’: Navigating privacy and the presentation of self on health discussion boards among individuals with long-term conditions, by Ellen Brady, Julia Segar, Caroline Sanders in Journal of Medical Internet Research Vol. 18, #10, page e274, October 13, 2016

Keywords: privacy; ethics; research ethics; informed consent; patients;
social support

Posted in News | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Privacy on long term condition health discussion forums

Prof Jonathan Edwards comments on MEGA Big study oppostition

Opposing MEGA blog comment by Professor Jonathan Edwards about OMEGA Petition, 20 October 2016

Jonathan Edwards, Emeritus Professor of Connective Tissue Medicine, commented on a Discussion – Petition: Opposing MEGA

jonathan-edwardsI was very concerned that a counter petition of this sort would be an own goal. However, reading this I cannot really fault it and am actually impressed by much of the wording and argument. The up front reference to researchers whose work has been shown to be substandard may seem inflammatory but we are past that now and I think being to the point is a strength. The point that MEGA is not the only game in town is well made. From my point of view I have yet to see any information that would convince me that any original thought has gone into the project. I am not a fan of Big Data. They jumped the gun and it is entirely legitimate to say so because it is an insult to the patients’ intelligence.

So I think I would encourage all members to sign. If the petition is there and is making a fair point good numbers of signatures would have impact.

Click here to see the petition

Give this MEGA project a chance to fly – don’t try to strangle it at birth, says Dr Charles Shepherd, 3 October 2016

MEGA research for M.E./CFS: pledge your support

MEGA Questions and Answers

Posted in News | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Prof Jonathan Edwards comments on MEGA Big study oppostition